Ad
News
EOS Block Producers Violate Constitution, Freeze 7 Suspect Accounts EOS Block Producers Violate Constitution, Freeze 7 Suspect Accounts
🚨 This article is 6 years old...

EOS Block Producers Violate Constitution, Freeze 7 Suspect Accounts

EOS Block Producers Violate Constitution, Freeze 7 Suspect Accounts

Photo by Joshua Earle on Unsplash

In violation of the rules of the EOS constitution, the project’s 21 block producers have frozen seven accounts suspected to be compromised.

The move was made in line with the EOS911 Initiative — a new security protocol designed to recover stolen funds and return them to the victims of phishing attacks.

Knowingly violating rules of the EOS constitution, the block producers are facing criticism for acting beyond their authority. As per the constitution, such action can only be authorized by the blockchain’s arbitration bodies — EOS block producers may only execute their decisions.

Article III of the constitution outlines the breach in question:

-# Article III – Rights -The Members grant the right of contract and of private property to each other, therefore no property shall change hands except with the consent of the owner, by a valid Arbitrator’s order, or via community referendum.

Why did they do it?

Put forth by leading block producer EOS42, EOS911 was a hurried initiative to safeguard a number of token holders that were robbed of their private keys. While funds were offered momentary protection by the inactive EOS blockchain — as soon as the mainnet’s 72-hour staking period ended, all affected wallets were vulnerable.

EOS block producers (BPs) pleaded their case to EOS Core Arbitration Forum representatives — effectively the blockchain’s law enforcement agency. Waiting for a green light from the arbiters, the BPs received a preliminary notice from ECAF warning the freezing of accounts would soon be sanctioned.

Although, all did not unfold as expected. Pointing to the current interim constitution, ECAF’s ruling of inaction meant EOS BPs did not, in fact, have permission. However, this was not enough to deter BPs who swiftly froze the 7 accounts, explaining:

“EOS New York chose to enact this freeze because we believed that we were following the spirit of the governance system we as a community seek to create, despite it being formally absent. EOS is a platform meant to enable solutions which protect life, liberty, and property and that’s what we believed we were doing through this emergency action.”

Response to the move has been mixed.

Amongst proponents of decentralization, the collusion of the block producers has typically been met with disdain. Charlie Shrem, tweeted:

In favor of EOS, many have been quick to defend the actions, pointing to the BPs’ protection of legitimate account holders. EOS Nation — a public community of EOS advocates stepped in to explain the move:

Just days after the stalled launch of its mainnet, the violation comes as the latest sting in a stream of controversies faced by EOS — including one Cornell professor’s prediction of a “massive exchange hack” brought about by a vulnerability in the blockchain’s code.

EOS Market Data

At the time of press 4:24 am UTC on Nov. 25, 2019, EOS is ranked #5 by market cap and the price is up 1.14% over the past 24 hours. EOS has a market capitalization of $5.7 billion with a 24-hour trading volume of $2.34 billion. Learn more about EOS ›

EOS

4:24 am UTC on Nov. 25, 2019

$6.24

1.14%
Crypto Market Summary

At the time of press 4:24 am UTC on Nov. 25, 2019, the total crypto market is valued at at $244.88 billion with a 24-hour volume of $74.17 billion. Bitcoin dominance is currently at 56.79%. Learn more about the crypto market ›

Mentioned in this article
Posted In: , Price Watch