Charlie Lee refutes that Litecoin is “being abandoned,” active development continues

Charlie Lee asserted Litecoin development is alive and well. Meanwhile, reports based on the project’s GitHub numbers suggest it is “being abandoned.”

GitHub numbers suggest Litecoin is being abandoned?

Litecoin has continued to receive scrutiny for its perceived lack of new code development. Electric Capital said Litecoin was “being abandoned,” with the project experiencing a precipitous drop in development activity.

In the venture fund’s March 2019 report, Electric Capital cross-analyzed top cryptocurrency projects and concluded Litecoin was “being abandoned.” The study cited figures showing a precipitous drop in the project’s GitHub commits alongside monthly active developers falling from 40 developers to 3 within 2019.

Charlie Lee directly refutes this supposed lack of development activity. Lee claims Litecoin’s GitHub numbers are do not accurately represent the work the team has done for Litecoin in 2019.

Numbers don’t tell the whole story

Litecoin has a small group of core developers. Include Lee, the team has six developers who consistently work on the project’s codebase.

Litecoin’s code is “kept very close” to Bitcoin’s. This means upgrades from Bitcoin are systematically integrated into Litecoin’s. As a result, only one lead developer needs to merge new code into the project’s code base while the rest of the team performs supporting roles, said Lee.

Another factor that negatively affects Litecoin’s appearance is how GitHub assigns dates for new contributions. Much of the project’s recent code was “mostly written in 2018,” even though the work was modified and incorporated in 2019. GitHub marks the work as if it was done in 2018. Consequently, for those unaware, it would appear “Litecoin developers took the year off,” but this is untrue asserted Lee.

Another factor working against Litecoin’s appearances is how the team manages updates to the master branch—the main version—of the project. For high-stakes software like a cryptocurrency, it’s important to ensure new code is battle-tested to minimize potential damage to stakeholders.

As a result, Charlie Lee and his team don’t tend to work on the master branch of the project. Instead, the team is working on Litecoin Core release 0.18.1 on a personal branch of one of the devs. When the version is merged into the master branch then GitHub will suddenly register all of the development done in 2019.

Just looking at the numbers it’s not unreasonable to assume the project is inactive. However, with awareness of Litecoin’s development process it’s clear the project is far from “being abandoned.”

Problem with GitHub Commits

GitHub commits are easily gameable, meaning ranking services like CryptoMiso do not accurately measure a project’s developer activity. Software developers have been highly critical of these metrics as it doesn’t accurately represent the work done on a project. Projects like TRON are criticized for their (allegedly artificially) inflated commits, with allegations that developers are making trivial changes to the codebase to manipulate the vanity metric.

In contrast, Litecoin is one of the projects that is inaccurately represented by its commits, implied Lee. Instead for those aware of LTC’s development practices it would seem Litecoin is alive and well.

Litecoin | LTC

Updated: Nov 7 at 2:32 am UTC

Litecoin, currently ranked #5 by market cap, is up 4.81% over the past 24 hours. LTC has a market cap of $5.66B with a 24 hour volume of $3B.

Chart by CryptoCompare

Litecoin is up 4.81% over the past 24 hours.

Posted In: , People of Blockchain, Price Watch, Technology
Invest with AMFEIX

Like what you see? Get more Litecoin news in your inbox

Subscribe to CryptoSlate, our daily newsletter containing the top stories and analysis.

Sign up to stay informed
Mitchell Moos

Mitchell Moos

Contributing Analyst @ CryptoSlate

Mitchell is a software enthusiast and entrepreneur. His first startup built algorithms for optimizing cryptocurrency mining. Prior to CryptoSlate, Mitchell was a project manager at a firm that built distributed software on Hyperledger. In his spare time he loves playing chess and hiking.

View author profile

Commitment to Transparency: The author of this article is invested and/or has an interest in one or more assets discussed in this post. CryptoSlate does not endorse any project or asset that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Please take that into consideration when evaluating the content within this article.

Disclaimer: Our writers' opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies.