ZenLedger
·

Tether Exchange Vulnerability Raises Security Concerns, New Research Suggests USDT Wash Trading on Kraken

Tether Exchange Vulnerability Raises Security Concerns, New Research Suggests USDT Wash Trading on Kraken

This week, US-Dollar pegged stablecoin Tether once again captured cryptocurrency community attention for the wrong reasons with poorly-implemented Tether exchange integration resulting in the successful execution of a double spend.

Tether’s tenuous relationship with the cryptocurrency market has been further stressed by an in-depth investigation into USDT movement on Kraken that experts labeled as “indicative of wash trading.”

Concern regarding the integrity of Tether code was sparked on June 28, 2018, when Chinese blockchain cybersecurity  company SlowMist posted a tweet evidencing a potential security vulnerability exploit used to execute a double spend:

Translated, the tweet reveals that by sending a transaction to an unnamed exchange without entering correct field values on a transaction, a user was able to successfully execute a double spend. JR Willett, the founder of OmniLayer — the platform upon which Tether was built — commented on the exploit via Reddit, providing an explanation of the vulnerability:

“It appears that what happened here is that an exchange wasn’t checking the valid flag on transactions. They accepted a transaction with valid=false (which they should not have), and then the second “double spend” transaction had valid=true, which they also accepted.”

The double spend, according to Willett, occurred not due to a flaw in the Tether code, but instead with the exchange itself, which failed to integrate Tether in a secure manner:

“Unless I am missing something, this is just poor exchange integration.”

Tether Releases Statement, Exchanges Respond

Tether was quick to assuage fears that the code that drives the USDT token secure, taking to Twitter to post an update denying culpability for the exploit:

OKEx issued a public statement subsequent to the SlowMist announcement, notifying users that the exchange is aware of the loophole and is not exposed, shedding light on the method through which the exploit is executed:

“When a digital asset exchange is processing a USDT deposit, it may fail to verify if the validity of the transaction is “true”. So, a user’s account can be credited with USDT, even if the deposit failed, and the user will be able to trade with the tokens credited.”

New Analysis Hints Toward Suspicious USDT Activity

While the small-scale double spend controversy appears to stem from a minor exchange implementation issue, a new study released by Bloomberg on Tether trading activity on popular cryptocurrency exchange Kraken may have far more serious implications.

Published via Bloomberg by a group of analysts on June 29, the analysis examined Kraken order book data that consisted of 56,000 trades between May 1 and June 22, revealing several data points that market experts have highlighted as potentially indicative of wash trading.

The Final Frontier of Crypto Decentralization: DEXs and The Liquidity Problem
Related: The Final Frontier of Crypto Decentralization: DEXs and The Liquidity Problem

The impact of wash trading and unscrupulous liquidity management techniques within the cryptocurrency market is a pressing issue in the current crypto ecosystem. The Bloomberg study, performed with assistance from New York University Professor Rosa Abrantes-Metz and former Federal Reserve bank examiner Mark Williams, found several “red flags” associated with market manipulation.

Strangely specific order sizes extending to over 5 decimal places occurred frequently within the dataset examined by the investigative team, a factor that causes Abrantes-Metz and Williams to “suspect that such numbers could be signals to cheaters’ automated trading programs — triggering automated wash trading.

Williams commented on the suspicious nature of transactions expressing a fifth decimal point:

“Many of the trade amounts are frequently occurring to the fifth decimal point, a unique identifier which increases the probability it is being generated by the same person or entity,”

The University of Texas Professor John Griffin, who published a study on USDT-assisted Bitcoin price manipulation that shook the cryptocurrency market last month stated that the data provided by the study was “suggestive of wash trading” in an interview with Bloomberg:

“Not sure what the motivation is. The more I looked into it, the more sketchy it seemed … No human would enter that order. It doesn’t make sense.”

Kraken Chief Executive Officer Jesse Powell, however, denies that the exchange has any involvement with Tether-related market manipulation in a statement issued to Bloomberg:

“Nothing looks out of place to us in our publicly available data feed.”

Posted In: , Altcoins, Analysis, Crypto Exchanges, Stablecoins, Trading
Invest with AMFEIX

Like what you see? Subscribe to CryptoSlate

Get our daily newsletter containing the top blockchain stories and crypto analysis straight to your inbox.

Sign up to stay informed
Sam Town
Author

Sam Town

Samuel is a freelance journalist, digital nomad, and crypto enthusiast based out of Bangkok, Thailand. As an avid observer of the rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem he specializes in the FinTech sector, and when not writing explores the technological landscape of Southeast Asia.

View author profile

Disclaimer: Our writers' opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies.