Greenpeace USA stops accepting Bitcoin donations due to environmental concerns 🚨 This article is 4 years old...
Greenpeace USA stops accepting Bitcoin donations due to environmental concerns
As debates about crypto's energy consumption rage on, some experts argue that Bitcoin "should die for the common good of the planet."
2 min read
Updated: May. 21, 2021 at 12:39 pm UTC
Cover art/illustration via CryptoSlate. Image includes combined content which may include AI-generated content.
The American arm of Greenpeace, a non-governmental multinational environmental organization, has stopped accepting donations in Bitcoin (BTC) amid growing concerns about the crypto’s impact on the world’s ecology, it told Financial Times yesterday.
“As the amount of energy needed to run Bitcoin became clearer, this policy became no longer tenable,” said a spokesperson for Greenpeace USA.
The organization first began accepting Bitcoin donations back in 2014 via payments processor BitPay. At press time, the corresponding page similarly states that Greenpeace is no longer accepting BTC—or any other crypto.
“Greenpeace USA no longer accepts donations in the form of Bitcoin or any cryptocurrency,” says the donation page on BitPay.
Notably, the initial announcement of Greenpeace supporting Bitcoin donations has also been scrapped from the organization’s website.
“As a completely independent organization, we do not take money from corporations or governments and rely primarily on individual donations,” said Ben Kroetz, Greenpeace USA director of online strategy, in the 2014 announcement. “BitPay’s reputation as a trusted and secure third party Bitcoin payment processor made it easy for us to begin accepting Bitcoin thus opening us up to new markets and donors.”
“Bitcoin should die”
But it seems that lately, environmental concerns have been outweighing the benefits of exposure to new markets and donors. Larisa Yarovaya, a lecturer at Southampton University and a former Russian Paralympic swimmer, even went as far as suggesting that Bitcoin “should die for the common good.”
“Bitcoin could be the first inefficient version of a disruptive technology. It should die for the common good of the planet and be replaced by a new model. It consumes more electricity than a country. All the rest is detail,” Yarovaya told Financial Times.
She further argued that Bitcoin’s energy consumption can’t be justified even by the coin’s high price since BTC is a speculative asset that does not “create a substantial amount of employment” nor is it widely used for transactions.
Meanwhile, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who was one of the most well-known proponents of crypto, has also been raising concerns about Bitcoin’s environmental impact recently.
To be clear, I strongly believe in crypto, but it can’t drive a massive increase in fossil fuel use, especially coal
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 13, 2021
Tesla also stopped accepting Bitcoin payments for its cars—after introducing the option just a couple of months earlier.
Mentioned in this article
Author 
Liam Frost
Liam Frost is a freelance journalist and editor with over 15 years of experience working for various media outlets across the world.
Latest US Stories
Latest Bitcoin Stories
Featured Story
Advertise Here
In this article
BitPay provides bitcoin and bitcoin cash payment processing services for merchants, and is one of the largest bitcoin payment processors.