Ad
News
Vitalik Buterin lays down roadmap to minimize centralization risk in Ethereum POS design Vitalik Buterin lays down roadmap to minimize centralization risk in Ethereum POS design

Vitalik Buterin lays down roadmap to minimize centralization risk in Ethereum POS design

Vitalik Buterin has suggested possible design changes that could potentially lower the risks of centralization.

Vitalik Buterin lays down roadmap to minimize centralization risk in Ethereum POS design

Cover art/illustration via CryptoSlate. Image includes combined content which may include AI-generated content.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin believes that the centralization of proof-of-stake (POS) poses a significant threat to Ethereum. POS centralization is where large stakers dominate, and small stakers join large pools.

Centralization increases the risk of problems like 51% attacks and transaction censorship. Additionally, there’s the risk of value extraction, where a small group benefits at the cost of Ethereum users.

According to Buterin, the risk exists in block construction and staking capital provision.

The problem

Ethereum follows the protocol of proposer-builder separation (PBS) for block construction. This means the job is divided between the validators, who propose blocks and auction off the responsibility of choosing block contents, and builders, who organize transactions into a block and place bids.

Buterin noted:

“This separation of powers helps keep validators decentralized, but it has one important cost: the actors that are doing the “specialized” tasks can easily become very centralized.”

Data as of October 2024 indicates that only two builders are responsible for 88% of Ethereum blocks. This means that if these two builders decide to censor a transaction, it can cause a delay—processing the transaction can take an average of 114 seconds instead of 6 seconds. While the delay may not affect certain transactions, the builders can manipulate the market by delaying urgent transactions, like those during DeFi liquidations.

Therefore, the concentration of power can seriously threaten Ethereum’s integrity.

Solutions

According to Buterin, one of the best solutions to avoid centralization is to break down block production responsibilities further. Buterin proposes that the task of choosing transactions should go back to the proposer or staker, and the builder will only get to select the ordering of the transactions and insert some of their own. This can be achieved through inclusion lists.

This is how it would work. A randomly selected staker creates an inclusion list, which includes valid transactions. A block builder, while creating a block, is required to include all the transactions in the inclusion list but has the power to rearrange them and add their own transactions.

Another possible solution is multiple concurrent proposers (MCP) schemes like BRAID. According to Buterin, “BRAID seeks to avoid splitting up the block proposer role into a low-economies-of-scale part and a high-economies-of-scale part, and instead tries to distribute the block production process among many actors, in such a way that each proposer only needs to have a medium amount of sophistication to maximize their revenue.”

Buterin noted that encrypted mempools are a crucial technology required to implement the design changes above. Using encrypted mempools, users can broadcast their transactions in an encrypted format along with proof of their validity. The transactions are also included in the blocks in encrypted form—the builder does not know the contents. The transactions are only revealed later.

Buterin wrote that the main challenge of implementing encrypted mempools is ensuring a design where the transactions are definitely revealed later. This can be achieved through two techniques: (i) threshold decryption and (ii) delay encryption.

Mentioned in this article
People were interested in these podcasts
Play Episode
36min
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Exploring decentralized AI and artistic innovation with Dimitri de Jong of 204.ai
The latest SlateCast episode featured Dimitri de Jong, founder and CTO of 204.ai, in conversation with Liam “Akiba” Wright, Editor in Chief of CryptoSlate, and Nate Whitehill, CEO of CryptoSlate. The discussion centered on de Jong’s innovative work at the intersection of AI, blockchain, and artistic expression. His experience spans decades of research and development in decentralized systems, blending technology with creative vision.From Microelectronics to AI and BlockchainDimitri’s journey began with a foundation in microelectronics and systems theory. As he explained, this background provided a deep understanding of complex systems and their optimization. His work in the 2010s revolved around using machine learning to simulate rare events and improve microchip designs for diverse environments, from space missions to nuclear reactors.“I specialized in systems theory and nonlinear systems to optimize designs in virtual environments,” said Dimitri. “That foundation translates directly into understanding decentralized systems.”This knowledge eventually led him to blockchain and AI, where he developed data sovereignty solutions such as Ocean Protocol, a decentralized data exchange, and Nevermind, focused on AI agents and data ownership.204.ai: Fusing Art and TechnologyDimitri described 204.ai as an “interactive design studio” where AI and artistic research converge. The studio explores immersive generative art, creating unique experiences like stepping into AI-enhanced paintings or witnessing fossils “come alive” through dynamic overlays.“We aim to make AI interactions multi-sensory and deeply engaging,” he said. “For example, we use brain-computer interfaces to enhance real-time generative designs.”204.ai’s work spans institutional projects and public-facing immersive experiences. From kinetic installations to AI-driven nature simulations, Dimitri emphasized the importance of bridging creative expression and technological advancement.The Vision of a Universal Recomme
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Redefining data sovereignty: Alex Puig on blockchain and AI interoperability
In a recent episode of CryptoSlate's SlateCast, Alex Puig, the founder of Context Protocol, joined CryptoSlate Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill to discuss the critical importance of semantic data, data sovereignty, and the future of AI-driven interfaces. Puig shared insights on how blockchain-based solutions can transform data verification and accessibility in an AI-dominated world.From Blockchain Beginnings to Data SovereigntyAlex Puig’s journey into blockchain technology began with his fascination for Bitcoin and its potential to redefine traditional systems of trust. Over the years, his focus shifted from decentralized identity systems to solving challenges around data ownership and interoperability. He emphasized, “If I can own my tokens, maybe I can own my own data,” reflecting his vision for blockchain as a tool for personal and institutional empowerment.Puig explained how Context Protocol is working to create verified knowledge graphs and semantic data standards, ensuring data interoperability across platforms.“Semantic data enables us to achieve true interoperability, allowing our information to be read and utilized by any system,” Puig noted.The Power of Verified DataOne of the key challenges Puig identified is the lack of verifiable data for AI systems. “Being able to verify data is the most important thing,” he stressed, highlighting use cases like private health records or business information that need secure verification. Context Protocol tackles this issue by linking semantic data structures with blockchain-based verification. This approach ensures trust in AI interactions, preventing the spread of misinformation and enabling more accurate machine learning.Puig elaborated on practical implementations, such as enabling businesses to manage their data autonomously. He provided the example of local governments, stating,“Cities like Madrid and Barcelona are exploring how businesses can update their information, such as restaurant
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Anthony Scaramucci says Kamala's crypto stance could decide election
Anthony Scaramucci, the former White House Communications Director and founder of SkyBridge Capital, shared his insights on the future of crypto regulation in the United States during a recent SlateCast episode. With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, Scaramucci discussed how the outcome could significantly impact the crypto industry, particularly in relation to Bitcoin and broader regulatory approaches.Scaramucci began by analyzing the political stakes, positioning the election as a pivotal moment for the future of crypto in the US. “I still think it’s Trump’s election to lose, by the way, even though she has momentum,” Scaramucci said, referencing Kamala Harris’s current standing. However, he quickly pointed out the potential consequences if Harris fails to support crypto: “If she makes the positive crypto statements that I’m expecting after the convention and after the nomination, then I think Gensler’s gone.”Scaramucci’s comments suggest that the future of SEC Chair Gary Gensler, known for his aggressive stance on crypto, could be tied to Harris’s position on digital assets. He warned that if Harris aligns with figures like Elizabeth Warren, known for their critical view of the crypto industry, it could spell trouble for her campaign: “If she doesn’t make those statements and she’s lining up with the Warren minions… I think she’s going to lose the election.”He elaborated on the political implications, noting the increasing influence of the crypto community. “50 million people own the stuff. 5% of those people are single-issue voters and she will be signaling to them she doesn’t care,” Scaramucci explained, underscoring the potential electoral impact of crypto voters who prioritize the issue.Turning to Donald Trump, Scaramucci highlighted the former president’s evolving stance on crypto. Despite initially dismissing Bitcoin and other digital assets, Trump has begun to shift his position, driven by political calculations. Scaramucci described how Vivek
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Matthijs de Vries on the intersection of Al, Blockchain, and Decentralization
CryptoSlate chats with Matthijs de Vries, the CEO of Nuklai Data. AI is a lot of things. Some of these things make sense as decentralized, and some should be distributed with centralized governance for a tiny part.Credits Thanks to Liam 'Akiba' Wright for hosting and producing the episodes.   Connect with CryptoSlate: - X - Substack - Google News - Telegram - Instagram

Hide All Glossary Terms