Temporal: Enterprise Solution for Distributed Data

Answering Vitalik Buterin’s 7 Hard Questions For the Blockchain World Part 1: Hashpower Centralization

Answering Vitalik Buterin’s 7 Hard Questions For the Blockchain World Part 1: Hashpower Centralization

Ethereum co-founder and blockchain wunderkind Vitalik Buterin released a series of open questions to the cryptocurrency community in a recent discussion with Mars Finance International WeChat group, postulating seven issues within the blockchain ecosystem.

Buterin’s “hard questions for any blockchain people” deal with some of the biggest obstacles that stand between the current state of blockchain technology and widespread adoption, highlighting hashpower centralization, the lack of “useful” large-scale apps, the high frequency of hacks, dApp scalability and latency, issues with consensus methods, and the inefficiency of on-chain governance.

In this multi-part series, we will attempt to answer each of Buterin’s 7 questions.

Question 1: The Problem With Hashing Power

“Bitmain and affiliated pools now have ~53% of all Bitcoin hashpower. Isn’t this a really big problem?”

Buterin’s first question refers to the large portion of Bitcoin hashing power that is operated by Bitmain, the largest producer of ASIC miners globally. The total hashpower committed by Bitmain, spread over AntPool and BTC.com — both of which are owned by the Chinese crypto mining giant — as well as Bitmain affiliates have exceeded 50% frequently over the last several months.

Cobra, the anonymous co-owner of Bitcoin.org and BitcoinTalk took aim at Bitmain in March 2018, arguing that it;’s impossible for cryptocurrency users to place faith in the value of an asset that can be shut down by a centralized third party at any point in time.

Cobra’s March 2018 statement wasn’t the first time the BitcoinTalk owner crossed swords with Bitmain. A Twitter exchange in January saw @CobraBitcoin debate Bitmain co-founder Jihan Wu, labeling the mining entrepreneur an “an enemy of Bitcoin and freedom” and suggesting that the PoW algorithm should be changed to prevent mining pool monopolization:

The possibility that a single entity could take control over more than 51% of Bitcoin hashrate is highly concerning to crypto-libertarians, potentially destabilizing the Bitcoin network and allowing Bitmain to execute a 51% attack against the network.

BTC hashpower distribution via Blockchain.com

Bitcoin hashpower distribution has since adjusted, with Bitmain now controlling roughly 46% of all Bitcoin hashing resources. Wu, however, staunchly opposes any accusations of centralization leveled at the mining giant, highlighting the fact that Bitmain doesn’t own or control any of the hashing power it provides.

Ultimately, although Bitmain may operate a large, popular pool, it doesn’t mean that Bitmain owns the hashrate. Arguably, the possibility of a Bitmain-executed 51% attack is extremely small given the $4 billion profit haul reported by the company in 2017, generated directly by crypto mining.

You can find all the answers for our “Answering Vitalik Buterin’s 7 Hard Questions For the Blockchain World” series here:

Cover Photo by Thomas Kvistholt on Unsplash

Posted In: Adoption, Technology

The above advertisement is an affiliate link. CryptoSlate will earn a small commission if you sign up.

Like what you see? Subscribe to CryptoSlate

Get our daily newsletter containing the top blockchain stories and crypto analysis straight to your inbox.

Sign up to stay informed
Sam Town

Sam Town

Samuel is a freelance journalist, digital nomad, and crypto enthusiast based out of Bangkok, Thailand. As an avid observer of the rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem he specializes in the FinTech sector, and when not writing explores the technological landscape of Southeast Asia.

View author profile

Commitment to Transparency: The author of this article is invested and/or has an interest in one or more assets discussed in this post. CryptoSlate does not endorse any project or asset that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Please take that into consideration when evaluating the content within this article.

Disclaimer: Our writers' opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies.