Ad
News
Hard questions about Shelley answered on the Cardano Effect podcast Hard questions about Shelley answered on the Cardano Effect podcast
🚨 This article is 4 years old...

Hard questions about Shelley answered on the Cardano Effect podcast

Hard questions about Shelley answered on the Cardano Effect podcast

Photo by Matt Botsford on Unsplash

Three weeks in, everything is going smooth and according to plan for Cardano’s staking era. Now that the community has had enough time to get to know Shelley, the crew from the Cardano Effect podcast got together to provide a bit more detail about what the immediate future holds for Shelley and what the community can expect.

No more sleepless nights for developers at Cardano

Cardano’s Shelley era has been out for less than three weeks, but that hasn’t stopped the Cardano community from engaging heavily with the network. The latest data has shown that over 200 stake pools have produced blocks during that time—a significant feat for a network of any size.

However, strong engagement does come with its own drawbacks, one of which is having a community antsy for more features and development.

Some of the woes felt by the community were addressed in the latest Cardano Effect podcast, where Cardano’s service reliability manager Samuel Leathers and Kaizen Crypto’s Pritesh Gosal went through the ongoing decentralization process at Cardano.

While the consensus was that Shelley is only the first step in Cardano’s long process od decentralization, the bulk of the work regarding staking has already been done. The Shelley core team will be having a slow August, Leathers said, adding that the current state of the network means that there won’t be any more sleepless nights for Cardano developers.

This, however, doesn’t mean that the cogwheels aren’t spinning in the background.

The issue with the d-parameter

The first order of business during the podcast was addressing the often mysterious but incredibly important d-parameter. The d-parameter represents the process of decreasing the percentage of blocks on the Cardano network being produced by the Cardano federation. As Leathers explained, it’s a security parameter that enables Cardano to transition into Shelley slowly without sacrificing stability.

When the d-parameter equals 1, it means that 100 percent of the blocks on the Cardano network are produced by either IOHK or the Cardano Foundation. The d-parameter of the network in its current epoch is 0.9, which means that 90 percent of the blocks on the network are produced by the federation. As of now, 10 percent of all blocks are made by the community pools.

Leathers said that a proposal to decrease the d-parameter to 0.8 has already been submitted and will most likely be approved and introduced in the next epoch. However, the d-parameter won’t be decreasing exponentially after that—Leathers said that dropping it below 0.8 will take more time.

The main reason behind the slow drop of the d-parameter is Goguen. Cardano’s smart contract phase will most likely be deployed at the end of November or the beginning of December when it will introduce a multi-asset standard to the network. For this to function correctly, developers need to make sure that the peer-to-peer capability on the network is stable and giving up too much control of block production would make this process much more uncertain. The farthest the d-parameter could drop until then is 0.5.

It’s important to note that while the d-parameter is dropping to zero, the BFT nodes won’t be getting rewards for making blocks. All of the rewards that would have gone to them will spill out and be distributed to the community pools that have created blocks.

Leathers also pointed out that when the d-parameter reaches zero, it will be removed from the code. This means that once community pools begin producing 100 percent of the blocks on the network, there is no way for anyone from the Cardano federation to take control of the network. This could take 200 days, or around six months, according to Leathers.

Goguen through the eyes of stake pool operators

The d-parameter also has a direct effect on how the performance of stake pools is currently measured. Since Shelley launched, every stake pool that managed to produce a block within an epoch, a period of five days during which blocks are made, automatically falls into the category of pools with solid performance.

However, once the d-parameter drops below 0.78, the specific details of a stake pool’s performance will begin to matter. This means that pools that produce all of the blocks that have been assigned to them and distribute the most rewards to its delegators will find themselves at a much better position on the network.

The current number of stake pools that have made blocks until now indicates that we should start to see saturation levels very soon. Leathers noted that saturation at Daedalus is currently disabled at the UI, which means that most users staking through the wallet won’t be able to see the saturation of the network until the feature is released.

When it comes to new features and requirements, Leathers revealed that node multisig would most likely be released as early as September, as there was no need to release it together with Goguen in November.

What Goguen will bring about are higher requirements for pool nodes. As the Goguen code will be part of Cardano’s binary, specs for pool nodes will have to increase.

However, the increased requirements for pools will be followed by a mechanism that will allow pools to stay compatible. Goguen will bring about a feature that will enable pools to opt into what kind of things they want to support. It means that when the multi-asset standard comes, pools will be able to choose which assets on the Cardano network they allow to be delegated to them. While a major step forward for pools, there’s currently very little information about how this will look from the perspective of a stake pool operator.

Staking, delegating, rewards, and the Japan question

With more and more people delegating their ADA holdings to stake pools, the question of delegation fees arose. Most users that decided to stake their ADA noticed that delegating their funds to a wallet for the first time costs 2.17 ADA. As Leathers explained, that fee goes into the deposit of a stake pool for the delegation address you registered. The funds are returned to the user once they deregister the address they delegated from. He advised users that have a tendency to move their stake from address to address to deregister each one of them after they move to have the funds returned to them.

The Daedalus wallet will have this feature introduced soon, enabling users to deregister their addresses directly from the wallet interface.

This could prove to be much less of a problem once multi-pool delegation is enabled. Leathers said that users that want to delegate to several stake pools need to use a separate Shelley wallet for each one. Business analysts from IOHK are currently negotiating with some of the network stakeholders to determine how and when to implement this feature. However, it’s important to note that it will first be introduced to hardware wallets, while desktop wallets such as Daedalus and Yoroi will have to wait a bit longer.

The discussion about staking yielded a very interesting hypothetical question—what would happen if all of the available ADA was staked?

Many members of the Cardano community seem to have discussed the issue, coming to the conclusion that it would render the network essentially incapable of operating. However, it turns out that it could possibly be the best thing that could happen to Cardano.

If all of the 31 billion available ADA were staked on the Cardano network and spread out across all of the stake pools, the rewards for staking would decrease, but the price of ADA would skyrocket. Such a massive jump in ADA’s price wouldn’t happen because the circulating supply is diminished—on Cardano, all staked coins can be spent freely. The fact that the entire circulating supply of a token is working towards securing the blockchain will be what would (hypothetically, of course) push ADA through the roof.

When it comes to more realistic scenarios, many members of the community have been worried about the increasing centralization of ADA ownership. Most have pointed their finger at Japan, saying that the massive amount of stake that could come from the country could seriously shake up Cardano’s decentralization.

However, the Japanese question might ultimately prove to be positive for Cardano.

While it’s true that a disproportionally large amount of ADA is held by Japanese investors, a very small percentage of the total stake on the network is actually coming from the country. The bags being held in Japan mostly haven’t been moved since the ICO, which was held there. The fact that most Japanese holders haven’t moved or delegated their funds shows that they’re waiting for ADA to jump to sell off their positions.

If all of the funds were to be sold off from Japan, it would disperse them throughout the world. If the funds were to stay in Japan, we could expect more of them to be staked on the network or even more stake pools to be created—a win-win situation for Cardano either way.

Mentioned in this article
Posted In: , Technology
People were interested in these podcasts
Play Episode
38min
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Robin Obermaier discusses Bitcoin DeFi and cross-chain lending
In a recent episode of SlateCast, CryptoSlate's Senior Editor Liam "Akiba" Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill sat down with Robin Obermaier, the CEO and founder of Liquidium, to discuss the evolving landscape of DeFi on Bitcoin and the future of cross-chain lending.The Rise of Bitcoin DeFiObermaier began by addressing the current state of DeFi on Bitcoin, acknowledging its infancy while highlighting the progress made in fundamental technologies. He stated:"DeFi on Bitcoin is still in its infancy. Despite obviously a lot of people saying like, Bitcoin will have all of the tools that Ethereum has and Solana has within like a couple of months. That's just not realistic because we have so many more challenges on Bitcoin that we still have to overcome."Liquidium's Peer-to-Peer Lending ProtocolThe conversation then shifted to Liquidium's core offering - a peer-to-peer lending protocol for Bitcoin-based assets. Obermaier demonstrated the platform's functionality, explaining how lenders can create loan offers against Ordinals, Runes, and BRC20 tokens, while borrowers can use these assets as collateral to obtain Bitcoin loans."Lenders are creating offers, borrowers are accepting offers, lenders are countersigning, and then the loan starts," Obermaier explained, highlighting the simplicity of the process.Expanding to Eastern MarketsWhen asked about Liquidium's plans to adapt to Eastern markets, which are heavily focused on fungible tokens, Obermaier outlined their strategy:"We started a basically a Chinese Twitter account. We translated our landing page to Chinese already and then also going to translate the application soon. We're also seeing a large influx from the Brazilian market, actually."Bitcoin Layer 2s and Cross-Chain SolutionsThe discussion then turned to the potential of building on Bitcoin Layer 2s. Obermaier expressed a preference for solutions that allow interaction with Layer 1 Bitcoin, citing concerns about fragmentation and the need for users to bridge or wrap ass
CryptoSlate SlateCast
How Leona Hiroki's INTMAX brings stateless scaling and privacy to Ethereum
In a recent episode of the SlateCast, CryptoSlate’s Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill sat down with Leona Hioki, the Co-founder of INTMAX. The conversation delved into the transformative potential of stateless zero-knowledge rollups (ZK-rollups), which prioritize privacy, scalability, and decentralization. Hioki’s insights shed light on INTMAX’s unique approach to blockchain infrastructure, the influence of Japanese engineering culture, and the broader impact of privacy on the crypto landscape.A New Paradigm in Blockchain ScalabilityHioki introduced INTMAX as a “stateless ZK-rollup” with features like near-zero gas fees, privacy by default, and interoperability with other blockchains. Unlike traditional rollups that store transaction data on-chain, INTMAX’s stateless architecture allows data to be managed off-chain and verified using cryptographic proofs.“We’re aiming for extreme scalability by shifting data and computation to the client side,” Hioki explained.This allows for significantly reduced costs and improved privacy for users.INTMAX’s system offers a distinct trade-off compared to traditional ZK-rollups. By moving computation to users’ devices, the burden on blockchain nodes is minimized, resulting in a lightweight infrastructure.“We’ve achieved something unique in the blockchain space — extreme scalability and privacy without compromising decentralization,” Hioki noted.The Stateless Architecture AdvantageINTMAX’s stateless approach challenges the norm of blockchain rollups, which typically store transaction history on-chain. Hioki emphasized that INTMAX’s design is inspired by “Plasma Prime,” an early concept for off-chain scaling solutions. He highlighted that the key to INTMAX’s architecture is "parallelizing computation and storage,” which shifts most of the processing work to end-user devices, reducing reliance on the blockchain’s infrastructure.“If you’ve got 5 million users, that’s 5 million nodes working in parallel instead o
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Phillip Alexeev on CrossFi: The bridge between crypto and traditional banking
In a recent episode of SlateCast, Phillip Alexeev, Chief Growth Officer at CrossFi, joined CryptoSlate’s Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill to discuss the platform's innovative solutions to integrate crypto with traditional finance. CrossFi’s mission is to provide seamless financial inclusivity through a robust ecosystem that supports non-custodial crypto transactions, partnerships with banks, and scalable blockchain technology.Alexeev described CrossFi as “the Apple Pay for crypto,” emphasizing its role as a bridge between decentralized finance (DeFi) and mainstream banking.“Our focus has always been empowering users by removing gatekeepers while providing access to advanced financial tools,” he said.Non-Custodial Payments RedefinedAt its core, CrossFi offers a unique payment technology enabling users to transact directly from their Web3 wallets at any point-of-sale terminal worldwide. This approach eliminates the need for custodial platforms, maintaining users’ control over their funds. Alexeev highlighted the platform's ability to “connect any Web3 wallet to the CrossFi app,” facilitating crypto-to-fiat transactions seamlessly and securely.Unlike traditional crypto cards, CrossFi partners directly with banks to interact with smart contracts, bypassing third-party intermediaries.“We’ve designed an ecosystem with fewer points of failure while forcing banks to innovate and adopt crypto technology,” Alexeev explained.Why Build a New Layer-1 Blockchain?Addressing the decision to build a proprietary layer-1 blockchain, Alexeev acknowledged the challenges of integrating blockchain with existing banking infrastructure.“No existing blockchain met the security, scalability, and compatibility requirements of traditional banks,” he stated.The customized blockchain allows CrossFi to support seamless interaction between decentralized technologies and institutional frameworks.Flat Fees for TransparencyCrossFi aims to disrupt conventional payment systems
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Sam Williams shares how AO will transform decentralized computing
In a highly anticipated SlateCast episode, Sam Williams, the visionary founder of Arweave, joined Liam “Akiba” Wright and Nate Whitehill to unveil AO, Arweave’s groundbreaking decentralized supercomputer protocol.Promising to disrupt decentralized computing, AO introduces novel approaches to parallel processing and message passing, aiming to create a trustless, scalable, and intelligent market for computation.The Genesis of AORecounting the origins of AO, Williams shared his vision of creating a decentralized ledger of knowledge and speech that could withstand the test of time. As Arweave gained traction, he realized the potential for a decentralized computing system built upon the permanent log of information.“We essentially set out to solve that problem. How do we make a ledger of history and speech, that is replicated around the world with no single centralized point of failure so that we can do for speech what Bitcoin did for money, basically, make it trustless, your access to speech in cyberspace,” Williams explained.A Fair and Incentivized LaunchWilliams highlighted the importance of AO’s fair launch, with no pre-mining or pre-sales, a departure from many blockchain projects:“We ended up going with a system that actually splits its token components between, giving value to Arweave token holders, which incentivizes the security of its base layer, which is good for AO, good for Arweave, and also for bridging assets from other networks.”Scalability and Parallel ProcessingAO promises to handle high transaction volumes and massive datasets through its modular architecture. Williams elaborated on the system’s scalability, explaining,“You have these different subnets that are responsible for different parts of the system.All of them are staked using the AO token, and you basically stake against the correctness of a state transition of one form or another.”Decentralized Finance and Agent IntelligenceOne of AO’s most exciting potential applications lies in decentralize

Hide All Glossary Terms