· ·

Advanced botnet attack caused $1.2bn in Bitcoin longs liquidation on BitMEX

Advanced botnet attack caused $1.2bn in Bitcoin longs liquidation on BitMEX

Bitcoin’s price struggle was further exacerbated last week when the coin plunged to $3,700 on BitMEX and caused almost $1.2 billion in long contracts to be liquidated on the platform. Now, the exchange’s CTO has revealed that the liquidations were caused by sophisticated botnet attacks that have been probing the platform for days and were responsible for another attack last month.

BitMEX addressing the huge Bitcoin drop on its platform

In the midst of one of the bloodiest days in the crypto market, BitMEX, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world, suffered a 25-minute outage. The Mar. 12 outage sent the price of Bitcoin spiraling down to as low as $3,700, wiping out $1,800 from its price in a single day. According to data from Datamish.com, almost $1.2 billion in Bitcoin long contracts have been liquidated on Mar. 12.

Chart showing Bitcoin long contract liquidation on BitMEX in the past 14 days
Chart showing Bitcoin long contract liquidation on BitMEX in the past 14 days. (Source: Datamish)

Immediately after the event, rumors about the possible foul play from BitMEX began circulating in the crypto community, with many suspecting that the exchange itself could have caused the outage in order to curb further price drops.

Although BitMEX was quick to respond to the issue, assuring its users that the outage was caused by hardware issues with its cloud service providers, few were convinced that the explanation was as simple as that.

And now, the exchange’s co-founder and CEO Arthur Hayes commented on the issue for the first time, saying that the BitMEX team has been gathering the facts in the past three days and will be addressing all of the concerns raised by the community in the following days.

BitMEX falls victim to botnet attacks for the second time

According to Samuel Reed, the chief technical officer at BitMEX, the exchange fell victim to a botnet at both 02:15 UTC and 12:56 UTC. He believes that the botnet had been probing the system for a while and found an endpoint in the platform’s cloud that was “consistently” and “reliably” slow.

The first attack was resolved rather quickly—the exchange registered the attack as dying volume on the Amazon elastic block store service. It then flailed over the database and resumed the service.

The second attack was also quickly resolved, but this time the exchange correctly identified that it was an attack, not a problem with the cloud. While the slow query was fixed, Reed noted that there are major security updates that still need to be made.

“Some of these changes are already present. Others, like public-facing protocols around downtime, trade suspension, resumption, and communication, are in the works,” he tweeted.

More information about the attacks and the ways the exchange plans on improving them will be released in the coming days, Reed said, adding that details about the liquidations and the exchange’s insurance funds will also be revealed soon. He also noted that they believe the same botnet was responsible for the DDoS attack the platform suffered on Feb. 15.

However, a large part of the crypto community still remained highly critical of BitMEX, even after the exchange began refunding users who were affected by the Last-Price triggered stops set on the ETH/USD trading pair. Many scolded the exchange for not relying on their own servers, while some even questioned whether the botnets were hired by BitMEX’s own insurance fund.

Posted In: , , Trading

The above advertisement is an referral link.

Invest with AMFEIX

Like what you see? Subscribe to CryptoSlate

Get our daily newsletter containing the top blockchain stories and crypto analysis straight to your inbox.

Sign up to stay informed
Priyeshu Garg

Priyeshu Garg

Analyst @ CryptoSlate

Priyeshu is a software engineer who is passionate about machine learning and blockchain technology. He holds an engineering degree in computer science engineering and is a passionate economist. He built his first digital marketing startup when he was a teenager, and worked with multiple Fortune 500 companies along with smaller firms. When he is not solving transportation problems at his company (Ola), he can be found writing about the blockchain or roller skating with his friends.

View author profile

Commitment to Transparency: The author of this article is invested and/or has an interest in one or more assets discussed in this post. CryptoSlate does not endorse any project or asset that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Please take that into consideration when evaluating the content within this article.

Disclaimer: Our writers' opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies.