Ad
News
Transaction volume up, users down – is OpenSea challenger LooksRare gmi? Transaction volume up, users down – is OpenSea challenger LooksRare gmi?
🚨 This article is 3 years old...

Transaction volume up, users down – is OpenSea challenger LooksRare gmi?

After a blasting start, OpenSea challenger LooksRare still boasts high transaction volumes, but are the numbers “real” and is LooksRare gonna make it in the long run?

Transaction volume up, users down – is OpenSea challenger LooksRare gmi?

Cover art/illustration via CryptoSlate. Image includes combined content which may include AI-generated content.

Join Japan's Web3 Evolution Today

Two weeks since launch, LooksRare, portrayed as a community driven challenger to the NFT behemoth OpenSea, is still printing high levels of transaction volumes. On the surface, it looks like LooksRare has gotten itself a foothold on the market.

OpenSea has had, and still have, an impressive journey from around $71 million in sales a year ago, to $36 billion today – that’s a 50,000 percent increase in sales, all thanks to the blow-of-top interest in NFTs manifested in the explosion of profile pictures, art, collectables and in-game items. In its latest funding round, OpenSea was valued at $13 billion.

OpenSea’s vulnerable underbelly

There are, however, a couple of things that leave OpenSea vulnerable. One is the fact, or at least a low probability, that OpenSea will ever release a token. Reasons being many, one is securities regulation in the U.S. and that OpenSea is basically synonymous with the whole NFT mania, meaning the centralized, U.S.-based, private company has regulatory eyes on it. And then, there are few incentives for the people involved in OpenSea to release a token.

Another other obvious vulnerability is that the OpenSea platform is published under an open source license, so anyone can clone it, a third being that users on OpenSea pay a two percent fee to the platform, and ultimately its owners – the latter being a nail in the eye to the more crypto-ethos leaning partition of the community.

To the surprise of few, these vulnerabilities are being exploited by challengers in the market, the most hyped at the moment being LooksRare. Launched only a couple of weeks ago, LooksRare is already making a mark.

By releasing a token first thing, LooksRare took off with a bounce, airdropping LOOKS tokens eligible to all OpenSea users who traded NFTs for more than three ETH. On the second day of its existence, trading volumes on LooksRare already exceeded that of OpenSea, and this has continued being the case for the past two weeks since launch. For this whole period, the trading volume in dollars on LooksRare has held itself to more than four times than on OpenSea.

LooksRare vs OpenSea Daily Volume
LooksRare vs OpenSea Daily Volume

Fees are funneled back to platform users

The secret sauce behind the immediate success of LooksRare spells tokenomics, and token incentives that OpenSea, as discussed above, cannot engage in.

Like OpenSea, LooksRare charges a two percent fee (in ETH), all the difference being that those fees are funneled back to the platform users who earn LOOKS when they interact with the platform. Furthermore, users are incentivised to stake the LOOKS earned to additionally earn yield at a, for the moment at least, very high annualized return.

And here’s the thing, 60 percent of staking yields come in wrapped ether (WETH), which is basically the same as real ETH, and the rest in LOOKS that compound over time. This is admittedly, well, rare. Not many yield farms pay out in WETH/ETH.

At the time of writing the LOOKS token is trading at $3.87, while it topped at $7.1 just before the whole crypto market came tumbling down the last few days. The token is ranked at number 117 in total market cap, currently just over $665 million, about five percent of the recent valuation of OpenSea.

What happens when the incentives run out?

This is, of course, wash trading as much as wash trading goes, but one may argue that that’s the point in employing token incentives – people flip NFTs on LooksRare, not perhaps because the platform is so much better than OpenSea’s, it probably isn’t given OpenSea’s head start, but because they have a fair chance to earn money while doing so. To the ideological, at least the fees do not end up in the pockets of the platform owners.

Does this mean everything is rosy around LooksRare? Not exactly.

While the trading incentives are real, yields from yield farming tend to decrease over time – the current APY will probably not age well. Whether or not the platform retains its trading volume is anyone’s guess. What happens when the incentives run out?

Second, LooksRare launched without audited smart contracts, and without an open, public GitHub repo. This does not look good; it’s downright irresponsible and users must beware of the technical risks involved.

Trading volume and users is trending down

Third, and perhaps most importantly for the future of LooksRare, the number of daily users is not as impressive as the trading volume, which, by the way, is trending downwards since the top on the 19th of January. Whether the latter is an effect of the general bearish market at the moment, or due to users actually abandoning LooksRare for good, is an open question.

LooksRare vs. OpenSea Daily Users
LooksRare vs. OpenSea Daily Users

Aside from trading volume in dollar terms, trading volume in terms of the number of daily transactions has been in OpenSea’s favor all the time, with the number of trades being about a hundred times more on OpenSea.

LooksRare vs. OpenSea Daily Transactions
LooksRare vs. OpenSea Daily Transactions

The number of daily users on LooksRare peaked at 3,540 users on the day after the launch, according to data from Dune Analytics, and has never seen this level since. The number of daily users have basically trended downwards during the whole two weeks period of LooksRare’s lifetime, and went below 1,000 for the first time on the 24th of January. By comparison, the number of daily users on OpenSea has been above 60,000 except for two of the days during the same two-week period.

Also, and more of a side note, LooksRare does not support any Layer-2 networks on Ethereum while, at least, OpenSea does support the Polygon sidechain.

NFT markets need more competition

The OpenSea NFT marketplace is, for the moment at least, totally dominating the NFT market on Ethereum, and by extension the world. The platform’s market share is hovering around 90 percent, and the centralized structure is in the hands of the founders and a few venture capitalists. A not very upsetting view is that the market needs more competition.

OpenSea’s dominance has already had some unfortunate casualties in the form of deplatformed platform users, albeit due to understandable intellectual property issues. But perhaps the most dangerous implication of OpenSea’s dominance is the fact that wallets, and just about everything else, is using OpenSea’s API to access NFT on-chain data, as pointed out by Moxie Marlinspike, founder of the messaging app Signal. If OpenSea goes dark for some reason, people won’t be able to see their NFT in, for instance, MetaMask.

Whether a player like LooksRare will change this situation is highly uncertain, although not impossible. Whether LooksRare will be able to grow and establish a significant market share on behalf of OpenSea remains to be seen. For one, there’s a significant network effect at play to the benefit of OpenSea. LooksRare have a few but important issues to fix, yes, but on the other hand, the project has one hugely important upside, one we’ve seen play out many times in this industry: the awesome power of tokenomics.

People were interested in these podcasts
Play Episode
60min
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Giovanni Santostani explains Bitcoin Models and Power Law's expansion
Bitcoin Power Law Theory creator Giovanni Santostani refutes some criticisms of his Bitcoin models and explains how the power law expands within the Bitcoin ecosystem.Credits Thanks to Liam 'Akiba' Wright for hosting and producing the episodes.   Connect with CryptoSlate: - X - Substack - Google News - Telegram - Instagram
CryptoSlate SlateCast
How Layer3 is reshaping on-chain user value - Brandon Kumar explains
CryptoSlate’s SlateCast recently welcomed Brandon Kumar, co-founder of Layer3, to discuss the platform’s mission to revolutionize crypto engagement through user-owned value. Joined by CryptoSlate’s Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill, Kumar shared insights into Layer3’s business model, future goals, and the broader trends shaping the crypto industry.Redefining User-Owned ValueLayer3’s core mission centers on "user-owned value," a concept that flips the traditional advertising model on its head. Kumar explained, “When a user is spending time on Layer3, they're actually able to earn, in addition to discovering and finding protocols relevant to their needs and interests.” Unlike traditional platforms like Google or Facebook, which monetize user attention for corporate profit, Layer3 ensures users share the economic value generated from their activity.By fostering this shift, Layer3 provides users a more direct connection to protocols and projects within the crypto ecosystem. Kumar elaborated,“What we're trying to basically convey is this notion of a user who spends time but also earns economic value while being advertised to.”The Journey from Traditional Finance to CryptoKumar’s background in traditional finance significantly shaped his approach to Layer3. He previously worked at Accolade Partners, a prominent alternative asset manager, where he gained experience in venture capital and technology investments.“We looked at what was happening in crypto venture and said it resembles a lot of what was happening in the 80s and 90s within traditional venture capital,” Kumar noted.This unique perspective allowed Kumar to recognize the potential of the crypto space early on. He emphasized that his financial experience taught him the importance of robust business models and defensibility. “Understanding business models and thinking about them in a dispassionate way was essential,” he said, adding that the experience helped him make strategic choices in La
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Exploring decentralized AI and artistic innovation with Dimitri de Jong of 204.ai
The latest SlateCast episode featured Dimitri de Jong, founder and CTO of 204.ai, in conversation with Liam “Akiba” Wright, Editor in Chief of CryptoSlate, and Nate Whitehill, CEO of CryptoSlate. The discussion centered on de Jong’s innovative work at the intersection of AI, blockchain, and artistic expression. His experience spans decades of research and development in decentralized systems, blending technology with creative vision.From Microelectronics to AI and BlockchainDimitri’s journey began with a foundation in microelectronics and systems theory. As he explained, this background provided a deep understanding of complex systems and their optimization. His work in the 2010s revolved around using machine learning to simulate rare events and improve microchip designs for diverse environments, from space missions to nuclear reactors.“I specialized in systems theory and nonlinear systems to optimize designs in virtual environments,” said Dimitri. “That foundation translates directly into understanding decentralized systems.”This knowledge eventually led him to blockchain and AI, where he developed data sovereignty solutions such as Ocean Protocol, a decentralized data exchange, and Nevermind, focused on AI agents and data ownership.204.ai: Fusing Art and TechnologyDimitri described 204.ai as an “interactive design studio” where AI and artistic research converge. The studio explores immersive generative art, creating unique experiences like stepping into AI-enhanced paintings or witnessing fossils “come alive” through dynamic overlays.“We aim to make AI interactions multi-sensory and deeply engaging,” he said. “For example, we use brain-computer interfaces to enhance real-time generative designs.”204.ai’s work spans institutional projects and public-facing immersive experiences. From kinetic installations to AI-driven nature simulations, Dimitri emphasized the importance of bridging creative expression and technological advancement.The Vision of a Universal Recomme
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Anthony Scaramucci says Kamala's crypto stance could decide election
Anthony Scaramucci, the former White House Communications Director and founder of SkyBridge Capital, shared his insights on the future of crypto regulation in the United States during a recent SlateCast episode. With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, Scaramucci discussed how the outcome could significantly impact the crypto industry, particularly in relation to Bitcoin and broader regulatory approaches.Scaramucci began by analyzing the political stakes, positioning the election as a pivotal moment for the future of crypto in the US. “I still think it’s Trump’s election to lose, by the way, even though she has momentum,” Scaramucci said, referencing Kamala Harris’s current standing. However, he quickly pointed out the potential consequences if Harris fails to support crypto: “If she makes the positive crypto statements that I’m expecting after the convention and after the nomination, then I think Gensler’s gone.”Scaramucci’s comments suggest that the future of SEC Chair Gary Gensler, known for his aggressive stance on crypto, could be tied to Harris’s position on digital assets. He warned that if Harris aligns with figures like Elizabeth Warren, known for their critical view of the crypto industry, it could spell trouble for her campaign: “If she doesn’t make those statements and she’s lining up with the Warren minions… I think she’s going to lose the election.”He elaborated on the political implications, noting the increasing influence of the crypto community. “50 million people own the stuff. 5% of those people are single-issue voters and she will be signaling to them she doesn’t care,” Scaramucci explained, underscoring the potential electoral impact of crypto voters who prioritize the issue.Turning to Donald Trump, Scaramucci highlighted the former president’s evolving stance on crypto. Despite initially dismissing Bitcoin and other digital assets, Trump has begun to shift his position, driven by political calculations. Scaramucci described how Vivek

Hide All Glossary Terms