Ad
Polkadot vs. Kusama, why the two “cousin” blockchains are here to stay Polkadot vs. Kusama, why the two “cousin” blockchains are here to stay

Polkadot vs. Kusama, why the two “cousin” blockchains are here to stay

Polkadot emerged as one of the biggest “Ethereum killers” this year, with its high throughput, low-fee network, and the demand for such features booming as the DeFi sector surged in 2020. It is maintained by five individual teams. For the uninitiated, Polkadot achieves this using its Parachain network, dividing its blockchain networks into many sub-pieces […]

Polkadot emerged as one of the biggest “Ethereum killers” this year, with its high throughput, low-fee network, and the demand for such features booming as the DeFi sector surged in 2020. It is maintained by five individual teams.

For the uninitiated, Polkadot achieves this using its Parachain network, dividing its blockchain networks into many sub-pieces so that verifying transactions can become more efficient. This ensures that a designated community or validator verifies data on every shard, instead of an entire network going through and getting updated with every new information.

Today, Irina Karagyaur, Western Europe Ambassador for Polkadot and Kusama, sat down with crypto edutainment platform Cryptonites to discuss the features that set the two blockchains apart, its technological advances, the burgeoning DeFi market, and other nuances with host Alex Fazel.

Image: Cryptonites

Karagyaur previously worked for real estate and city planning roles for over a decade before entering the blockchain space in 2016. She has never looked back since.

Kusama vs. Polkadot

While Kusama and Polkadot are independent, standalone networks built on very similar codebases, the former supports more experimental protocols and projects and has faster governance parameters, alongside lower barriers to entry.

As per the Polkadot blog, governance on both Polkadot and Kusama is decentralized and permissionless, and while the networks will evolve independently, they may or may not converge or diverge over time.

“If you are a startup and you have small funding, or you just have a very raw idea. You’re looking for developers to join you. You’re looking to test for bugs and things that may go wrong,” said Karagyaur on Kusama.

On the other hand, Polkadot prioritizes stability and has a much more methodical governance and upgrade processes. “We have very serious applications, very serious companies building on Polkadot. And it’s the new internet, right? There’s that element of a web 3.0,” added Karagyaur.

How does Polkadot fit into an Ethereum world?

Despite being called an “Ethereum killer,” Polkadot is meant to serve a different set of users and use cases and is exactly targeting to usurp what the world’s most-used blockchain has achieved.

For the uninitiated, Ethereum is a platform for deploying smart contracts or pieces of logic that control the movement of native assets on the Ethereum network. However, Polkadot aims to provide a framework for developers to both build their own blockchain as well as the ability to connect different blockchains with each other.

Karagyaur noted:

“So you can connect and you can build complementary projects on (Polkadot’s) parachains and. And of course, Polkadot doesn’t have forking, so prices of Gas cannot fluctuate so much and the whole idea is to enable the flow of transactions and never create a bottleneck.”

Meanwhile, Karagyaur noted that despite there being Polkadot and Ethereum, Kusama will continue to exist. “My opinion: Kusama will always be there. Initially, it was viewed as a project where you would experiment and the bulk of that will run into experiments, and then it could potentially cause, but then it stayed there.”

(Want to watch Irina Karagyaur discuss Polkadot’s use in digital currencies, CBDCs, Kusama in more detail, and city planning using blockchains and smart contracts? The entire video is available for streaming below.)

People were interested in these podcasts
Play Episode
33min
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Alexander Sudeykin talks building DeFi access for Telegram’s global audience
Alexander Sudeykin, Co-Founder of EVAA Protocol, joined CryptoSlate’s Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill in a recent SlateCast episode. The discussion centered around EVAA Protocol, its integration with the Telegram ecosystem, and the transformative potential of the TON blockchain in decentralized finance (DeFi). EVAA stands out as a decentralized lending platform, leveraging Telegram to simplify user engagement with DeFi tools.Revolutionizing DeFi Through Telegram IntegrationSudeykin highlighted EVAA Protocol’s unique positioning as a bridge between the TON blockchain and Telegram users. By creating a Telegram mini-app, EVAA allows users to access its lending and borrowing features directly from the messaging platform.“Telegram provides a seamless interface,” Sudeykin explained. “Users don’t need external wallets or complicated setups to start using the lending protocol. With Telegram wallets, we’ve significantly reduced the steps required to engage with DeFi.”The mini-app incorporates features like real-time notifications, ensuring users are alerted about critical activities, such as liquidations, making DeFi more user-friendly for newcomers.DeFi Growth on the TON BlockchainWhen asked about the TON ecosystem, Sudeykin detailed its evolution and potential for growth.“The TON blockchain is still in its early stages, with only about 20 protocols currently active. Compare that to hundreds on Solana, and you realize the opportunity for expansion,” he noted.He emphasized that utility projects, particularly in DeFi, will drive the next wave of growth on TON. EVAA aims to lead this transformation by offering robust tools for developers and users alike, fostering a thriving DeFi ecosystem.Innovative Tokenomics and GovernanceAlthough EVAA’s native token has yet to launch, Sudeykin shared insights into its planned utilities.“The EVAA token will serve as the governance backbone of our DAO, enabling token holders to vote on key decisions,” he said.In ad
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Robin Obermaier discusses Bitcoin DeFi and cross-chain lending
In a recent episode of SlateCast, CryptoSlate's Senior Editor Liam "Akiba" Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill sat down with Robin Obermaier, the CEO and founder of Liquidium, to discuss the evolving landscape of DeFi on Bitcoin and the future of cross-chain lending.The Rise of Bitcoin DeFiObermaier began by addressing the current state of DeFi on Bitcoin, acknowledging its infancy while highlighting the progress made in fundamental technologies. He stated:"DeFi on Bitcoin is still in its infancy. Despite obviously a lot of people saying like, Bitcoin will have all of the tools that Ethereum has and Solana has within like a couple of months. That's just not realistic because we have so many more challenges on Bitcoin that we still have to overcome."Liquidium's Peer-to-Peer Lending ProtocolThe conversation then shifted to Liquidium's core offering - a peer-to-peer lending protocol for Bitcoin-based assets. Obermaier demonstrated the platform's functionality, explaining how lenders can create loan offers against Ordinals, Runes, and BRC20 tokens, while borrowers can use these assets as collateral to obtain Bitcoin loans."Lenders are creating offers, borrowers are accepting offers, lenders are countersigning, and then the loan starts," Obermaier explained, highlighting the simplicity of the process.Expanding to Eastern MarketsWhen asked about Liquidium's plans to adapt to Eastern markets, which are heavily focused on fungible tokens, Obermaier outlined their strategy:"We started a basically a Chinese Twitter account. We translated our landing page to Chinese already and then also going to translate the application soon. We're also seeing a large influx from the Brazilian market, actually."Bitcoin Layer 2s and Cross-Chain SolutionsThe discussion then turned to the potential of building on Bitcoin Layer 2s. Obermaier expressed a preference for solutions that allow interaction with Layer 1 Bitcoin, citing concerns about fragmentation and the need for users to bridge or wrap ass
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Jesse Glass explains Decide AI’s push for on-chain AI agents and privacy-first LLMs.
In a recent episode of the SlateCast, CryptoSlate’s Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill sat down with Jesse Glass, Lead AI Researcher at Decide AI. The conversation delved into Decide AI’s groundbreaking efforts to merge artificial intelligence (AI) with blockchain technology, focusing on privacy-preserving identity verification, the role of decentralized AI in advancing AGI (artificial general intelligence), and the future of data ownership.Revolutionizing Identity VerificationJesse Glass opened the discussion by explaining Decide AI’s core mission: to create AI-driven applications that verify human identity without storing sensitive data on-chain. This approach enables "civil resistance" and ensures higher data quality while maintaining user privacy.“Decide AI is a set of AI applications and integrations for LLMs and identity. For ID, we use AI to verify that you're a human without storing that data on-chain,” said Glass.The system integrates with both blockchain and Web2 applications, offering a novel solution to data protection. With increasing scrutiny on how personal data is handled by centralized entities, Decide AI’s strategy could serve as a blueprint for privacy-first verification protocols.AI on the Blockchain: Challenges and PossibilitiesDeploying AI on-chain is a significant challenge, but one that Decide AI is actively addressing. Glass shared insights from his experience deploying GPT-2 on the Internet Computer (ICP) blockchain. He highlighted the technical hurdles posed by blockchain’s computational constraints, noting that traditional AI workflows rely on off-chain compute resources provided by large corporations.“When I experimented with deploying GPT-2 on the Internet Computer, it exposed how spoiled we’ve become outsourcing compute to megacorporations,” said Glass. “On-chain AI presents challenges like quantization, CPU cache vs. instructions, and WASM compilation, which requires optimized data structures.”Glass’s perspecti
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Max Li explains how decentralized AI will revolutionize trust in technology
In a recent SlateCast episode, Max Li, Founder and CEO of OORT, joined CryptoSlate’s Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill to discuss the transformative potential of decentralization in artificial intelligence (AI). As AI systems become increasingly integrated into daily life, OORT’s blockchain-powered data infrastructure aims to address growing concerns around transparency, privacy, and ethics.Decentralization: The Key to Trustworthy AILi began the discussion by emphasizing the importance of transparency in building trust for AI systems. “If you want to build trust in AI, transparency is the key,” he explained. Centralized platforms like Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services (AWS), he argued, limit transparency due to their closed infrastructure.OORT’s decentralized data cloud aims to address this by using blockchain to ensure that the data collection and storage process is open and verifiable.“At OORT, we want to ensure that the data collection process is transparent and accessible, so users can trust the AI models being developed,” said Li.Addressing Privacy and Ethical ChallengesLi highlighted how centralized AI systems often raise privacy concerns, as users have little control over how their data is used. With OORT, decentralized storage ensures data integrity and prevents unauthorized modifications.“Data stored in centralized systems can be manipulated without users’ knowledge. A decentralized approach ensures that tampering is impossible without leaving a trace,” he explained.The ethical implications of AI were another major focus. Li suggested that a decentralized ecosystem could support the development of “auditing AI,” where independent agents assess the ethical compliance of various AI models.“Imagine an auditing AI agent, developed by a global community, that can evaluate the ethical standards of AI models—similar to how Linux was built collaboratively,” Li proposed.The Need for Open AI InfrastructureClosed AI systems, according to Li

Latest Episodes