New York Assemblyman Ron Kim Passes a Bill That Could “Kill” BitLicense

New York Assemblyman Ron Kim Passes a Bill That Could “Kill” BitLicense

New York is known as a restless city, where every business has a golden opportunity to flourish. With such a reputation, the city has earned the title of “capital” of many things: capital of fashion, arts and even capital of sports having two baseball teams with one of the country’s highest fanbase.

But if there’s one thing New York is known for, it’s being seen as a “paradise” for the financial markets: Wall Street, more than just a stocks market, is a cultural icon. Few may know how it works, but everyone knows that if you’re looking to invest, New York is the place to be.

But nothing is perfect, and in the case of New York, the black spot is related to nothing less than the world of blockchain and cryptocurrencies. In 2015 the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYSDFS) published the Regulations of the Superintendent of Financial Services Part 200. Virtual Currencies.

This controversial law, commonly known as BitLicense, seemed more like a tool created to give traditional financial services an advantage over Fintechs.

It imposed a series of regulations so complicated that it was practically impossible for them to get the permissions they needed to operate.

BitLicense Ben Lawsky
Former New York Superintendent of Financial Services, Ben Lawsky, was responsible for the creation of the BitLicense, issued by the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYSDFS) under regulations designed for companies.

According to Coin Center’s research director, Peter Van Valkenburgh, BitLicense was “all a play to try and brutally shut down the viability of bitcoin.”

The process was so intricated that shortly after the law was passed, its creator Benjamin Lawsky founded Lawsky Group: A company specialized in providing financial consulting services to those requiring a BitLicense.

In other words, Lawsky Group was in charge of delivering solutions to the problems that began thanks to the actions of its very own CEO.

This complicated bureaucratic process, along with high fees (over $50,000), made a large number of internationally renowned companies linked to the world of cryptocurrencies just prefer to leave the city and settle elsewhere: Xapo, Bitfinex, BitQuick, BTCGuild, Eobot, Genesis Mining, GoCoin, Kraken, LocalBitcoins, Paxful, and Poloniex were some of the startups that joined the exodus according to reports published by Fortune.

Since its inception, BitLicense has been a motive of shame for lawmakers and blockchain fans.

Virtually no one supports it and the fact that the number of licenses granted was so minimal (according to official figures, only 3 Bitlicense Holders were operating by the end of 2017) made a revision necessary; something that for a long time remained elusive.

Early this year, however, the first signs of willingness among lawmakers to revoke this infamous law were observed. The story of how the meeting began, as reported by CoinDesk, needs no further explanation:

Anyone in the crowd that does not think the BitLicense needs to be reformed? Not a word from the audience. Then, a few seconds later, laughter at the awkward silence.

They were after a facelift for New York, making it once again a world reference for the blockchain industry. State Senator David Carlucci told CoinDesk:

“We want to put that out there, circulate it and really figure out how we can make this license in New York state something that works for the residents of New York state and the state economy.”

Later on, Mr. Ron Kim passed the Assembly Bill A9899, a proposal that would replace and eliminate BitLicense should it become law, creating a more accessible path for startups and Fintech companies to settle and operate in New York. In fact, Mr. Kim goes even further:

It would get rid of the fee and the actual license itself (…) We want to embrace the startup companies that are trying to launch exchanges.

On the official site, the bill is defined as “AN ACT to amend the banking law, in relation to safeguarding New York cryptocurrency business activity and prohibiting licensing fees for such business activity,” excellent news for the world of bitcoin, especially after Mike Carney’s favorable statements addressed to the G20.

There is still a long way to go. Mr. Kim is aware it could take until early 2019 to become law, but his optimistic positions, as well as those of his colleagues, make it possible to foresee a positive future for New York and perhaps a nice bullish run on Bitcoin prices.

Cover Photo by Anthony DELANOIX on Unsplash

Filed Under: , Regulation
Jose Lanz

Jose Lanz

Jose Antonio Lanz is a Latin American crypto enthusiast. He is a specialist on management and strategic planning with more over 10 years of experience. Lanz has worked as a legal and corporate consultant. He loves learning about Asian culture, understanding the true potential of blockchain and reading articles about "how to raise a baby for dummies."

View author profile

Commitment to Transparency: The author of this article is invested and/or has an interest in one or more assets discussed in this post. CryptoSlate does not endorse any project or asset that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Please take that into consideration when evaluating the content within this article.

Disclaimer: Our writers' opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies.