Announcing CryptoSlate Research — gain an analytical edge with in-depth crypto insight. Learn more.

Vitalik Buterin Serious About Ethereum Hard Cap Proposal

Vitalik Buterin Serious About Ethereum Hard Cap Proposal

April fools saw many joke announcements from the blockchain community, from CoinMarketCap ranking tokens in “Lambo” value to a prank blog post from Vitalik Buterin announcing the launch of a new Ethereum “stablecoin.” One of Buterin’s April fools statements, however, appears worth taking seriously — the Ethereum creator now seems to be earnest in his proposal of a hard cap on the supply of Ethereum tokens.

Buterin published an Ethereum improvement proposal on the 1st of April, floating the idea of a hard cap on the total supply of Ether:

“In order to ensure the economic sustainability of the platform under the widest possible variety of circumstances, and in light of the fact that issuing new coins to proof of work miners is no longer an effective way of promoting an egalitarian coin distribution or any other significant policy goal, I propose that we agree on a hard cap for the total quantity of ETH.”

The plan outlined a potential hard cap of 120,204,432 ETH, or twice the total amount of Ether sold in the original Ether sale in 2014. While many crypto community members were quick to dismiss the proposal as another April fools day prank, Buterin took to Twitter to voice his genuine thoughts on the matter, classifying the proposal as a “meta-joke.”

Hard Cap Proposal is “Very Real”

Following extended community discussion, Buterin clarified his position on the proposal, stating that

“The proposal is very real in the sense that the words actually were written in the GitHub issue, and the arguments for it are real arguments.”

In later statements, Buterin elaborated on the value of the proposition despite the semi-serious manner in which it was proposed:

“If the community wants fixed supply and people believe that EIP 960 is a good way to achieve that, then it should adopt the proposal. If the community does not, then it should not. This is true regardless of whether or not the original intent was in jest.”

Buterin appears to have given his casual proposal more in-depth consideration, following up his original Tweet with a list of arguments in favor of a hard cap that includes a nod toward the potential negative long-term impact of inflationary tokens:

Buterin’s proposal appears to have been intended to spark increased community engagement — the Ethereum creator has expressed frustration with the current status of community support for the project, so the half-serious proposition appears to have been devised to catalyze discussion of the Ethereum project.

The proposal could provide an answer to questions proposed by Ethereum network participants regarding the evolution of Ethereum’s economic model following the upcoming shift from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake consensus.

According to the original proposal post, however, Ethereum’s monetary policy won’t be decided until 120 million ether have been issued, at which point an alternative limit could be selected.

Filed Under: Ethereum
Sam Town

Sam Town

Samuel is a freelance journalist, digital nomad, and crypto enthusiast based out of Bangkok, Thailand. As an avid observer of the rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem he specializes in the FinTech sector, and when not writing explores the technological landscape of Southeast Asia.

View author profile

Commitment to Transparency: The author of this article is invested and/or has an interest in one or more assets discussed in this post. CryptoSlate does not endorse any project or asset that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Please take that into consideration when evaluating the content within this article.

Disclaimer: Our writers' opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies.