Ad
News
Bitcoin’s post-halving price action is mirroring that seen in 2016; What this means for BTC Bitcoin’s post-halving price action is mirroring that seen in 2016; What this means for BTC
🚨 This article is 5 years old...

Bitcoin’s post-halving price action is mirroring that seen in 2016; What this means for BTC

with insights from Messari
Bitcoin’s post-halving price action is mirroring that seen in 2016; What this means for BTC

Cover art/illustration via CryptoSlate. Image includes combined content which may include AI-generated content.

Bitcoin’s recent mining rewards halving event was long looked upon as a catalyst for the cryptocurrency to see further strength – from both a fundamental and technical perspective.

In the months following this event taking place, however, Bitcoin’s price has stagnated, with bulls and bears both reaching an impasse as it trades sideways between $9,000 and $10,000.

Although the cryptocurrency is currently seeing historically low volatility levels despite the recent adjustment to its block rewards, this isn’t unprecedented.

Data shows that a similar trend took place following the 2016 halving, and it took nearly a year before the benchmark cryptocurrency was able to embark on an intense uptrend.

Bitcoin consolidates following May’s halving, mirrors 2016’s trend

Since the start of May, Bitcoin has been caught within a broad and unrelenting trading range between $9,000 and $10,000.

It has been unable to surmount either of these levels and has been trading between them over the past ten weeks.

There have been a few occasions in which buyers or sellers surmounted the upper or lower boundaries of this trading range, but each move out of this channel has been fleeting.

Despite not seeing the immediate bullishness that many analysts predicted the halving would generate for the cryptocurrency, the recent event could still help create a tailwind that lifts BTC higher.

Data shows that after the 2016 halving, the benchmark digital asset saw a prolonged consolidation bout – similar to that seen currently.

This sideways trading ultimately evolved into a slight uptrend that allowed the cryptocurrency to end the year up nearly 40 percent from where it traded at following the halving.

BTC only gained momentum from here, which eventually transformed into the parabolic uptrend that led it to highs of $20,000 the following year.

Jack Purdy, a researcher at Messari, spoke about this in a recent post, offering a chart showing where the halving took place in 2016 relative to Bitcoin’s subsequent price action.

“2 months after the halving bitcoin’s done… well nothing… But reminder this was no different than 2016 which we know how that looks zoomed out.”

Bitcoin
Image Courtesy of Jack Purdy. Data Source: Messari

Bloomberg researchers: BTC’s 2016 similarities suggest a move to $20,000 is imminent

In the June edition of Bloomberg’s crypto outlook report, researchers also pointed to the striking similarities between 2016’s post-halving price action and that seen presently.

They conclude that these similarities suggest Bitcoin’s price is likely to rise towards its all-time highs of $20,000 by the end of this year.

“After 2014’s 60% decline, by the end of 2016 the crypto about matched the 2013 peak. Fast forward four years and the second year after the almost 75% decline in 2018, Bitcoin will approach the record high of about $20,000 this year, in our view, if it follows 2016’s trend.”

This possibility will likely depend on how BTC’s current sideways trading phase resolves.

Because many analysts view Bitcoin’s consolidation phase as being akin to a spring coiling up for a significant movement, a breakdown from here could spark a downtrend that spans throughout the rest of 2020.

Mentioned in this article
People were interested in these podcasts
Play Episode
38min
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Building the decentralized data layer with Powerloom’s Swaroop Hegde
Swaroop Hegde, CEO and Co-Founder of Powerloom, joined CryptoSlate’s Editor-in-Chief, Liam “Akiba” Wright, and CEO Nate Whitehill on The SlateCast to discuss the future of decentralized data layers. Backed by notable names like Blockchain Capital and Filecoin, Powerloom is setting a new standard for composable and decentralized data solutions, reshaping how users interact with on-chain data and fostering innovation across web3 applications.The Challenge of Reliable On-Chain DataSwaroop began by highlighting the current inefficiencies in accessing and verifying on-chain data. Traditional methods rely heavily on centralized sources, such as CoinMarketCap or specific blockchain dashboards, leading to potential data manipulation and outdated information.“Most of the usage when it goes outside of the dApp is actually coming from some sort of centralized indexer,”Swaroop noted, emphasizing the vulnerabilities inherent in such a setup.Powerloom addresses these issues with a decentralized node network, enabling real-time data computation without the need for a centralized intermediary.“With over 5,300 nodes, even non-technical users can contribute to the network, ensuring verifiability and reliability,” he explained.Powerloom’s Unique Approach to Data CompositionUnlike traditional indexers, Powerloom operates on a demand-driven system that aggregates data atomically. Swaroop explained,“We don’t sit and index all the data. Instead, we focus on composing data dynamically based on demand.”This approach allows Powerloom to cater to a variety of use cases, from trading data to lending rates across multiple chains.The platform’s composability extends beyond Uniswap and Aave, creating “data markets” that empower users to craft personalized queries and insights. These markets are decentralized and verifiable, ensuring users can trust the integrity of their data.Introducing Generative Prediction Markets (GPM)A standout feature discussed was Powerloom’s Generative Prediction Markets
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Matthijs de Vries on the intersection of Al, Blockchain, and Decentralization
CryptoSlate chats with Matthijs de Vries, the CEO of Nuklai Data. AI is a lot of things. Some of these things make sense as decentralized, and some should be distributed with centralized governance for a tiny part.Credits Thanks to Liam 'Akiba' Wright for hosting and producing the episodes.   Connect with CryptoSlate: - X - Substack - Google News - Telegram - Instagram
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Exploring decentralized AI and artistic innovation with Dimitri de Jong of 204.ai
The latest SlateCast episode featured Dimitri de Jong, founder and CTO of 204.ai, in conversation with Liam “Akiba” Wright, Editor in Chief of CryptoSlate, and Nate Whitehill, CEO of CryptoSlate. The discussion centered on de Jong’s innovative work at the intersection of AI, blockchain, and artistic expression. His experience spans decades of research and development in decentralized systems, blending technology with creative vision.From Microelectronics to AI and BlockchainDimitri’s journey began with a foundation in microelectronics and systems theory. As he explained, this background provided a deep understanding of complex systems and their optimization. His work in the 2010s revolved around using machine learning to simulate rare events and improve microchip designs for diverse environments, from space missions to nuclear reactors.“I specialized in systems theory and nonlinear systems to optimize designs in virtual environments,” said Dimitri. “That foundation translates directly into understanding decentralized systems.”This knowledge eventually led him to blockchain and AI, where he developed data sovereignty solutions such as Ocean Protocol, a decentralized data exchange, and Nevermind, focused on AI agents and data ownership.204.ai: Fusing Art and TechnologyDimitri described 204.ai as an “interactive design studio” where AI and artistic research converge. The studio explores immersive generative art, creating unique experiences like stepping into AI-enhanced paintings or witnessing fossils “come alive” through dynamic overlays.“We aim to make AI interactions multi-sensory and deeply engaging,” he said. “For example, we use brain-computer interfaces to enhance real-time generative designs.”204.ai’s work spans institutional projects and public-facing immersive experiences. From kinetic installations to AI-driven nature simulations, Dimitri emphasized the importance of bridging creative expression and technological advancement.The Vision of a Universal Recomme
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Essi and Ben explain Turtle Club’s approach to liquidity monetization
Esfandiar “Essi” Lagevardi, Founder and CEO of Turtle Club, and Benedikt “Ben” Schulz joined CryptoSlate’s Editor in Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill on the latest episode of the SlateCast. The duo shared insights on how Turtle Club is revolutionizing liquidity monetization and user engagement in Web3 by shifting the paradigm from value extraction to value creation.Redefining Liquidity Provision in Web3Essi described Turtle Club as a protocol focused on empowering users to monetize their on-chain activities across partner protocols, chains, and decentralized applications (dApps).“We’ve built a distribution protocol that allows anyone with a network to monetize user activity and return value to those generating it,” he explained.Essi emphasized the inefficiencies of traditional liquidity provisioning models, which he likened to “protocol-level loan sharking,” leading to adverse outcomes for stakeholders.Turtle Club’s approach addresses these inefficiencies by tracking users’ activities and distributing rewards based on protocols’ incentivization priorities, such as swap volume or liquidity contributions.Building Sustainable Incentive ModelsOne challenge Web3 protocols face is sustaining long-term user engagement. Essi highlighted that many protocols rely on short-term incentive campaigns that result in temporary spikes in activity, followed by steep drop-offs.“If your protocol doesn’t add sufficient value or utility, transitioning to a sustainable model becomes extremely challenging,” he stated.Instead, Turtle Club proposes a gradual, curve-like incentive model. Essi explained, “Start with moderate incentives to build traction, and as the protocol proves its value, transition to a sustainable framework while reducing dependency on subsidies.”Innovative Use of Treasury for Long-Term ValueBen elaborated on Turtle Club’s unique approach to treasury management, distinguishing it from other DAOs. Instead of selling tokens received from partner protocols, T

Hide All Glossary Terms