Crypto Exchanges

Binance CEO Responds to Vitalik’s “Burn in Hell” Comments

Binance CEO Responds to Vitalik’s “Burn in Hell” Comments

Binance CEO Changpeng ‘CZ’ Zhou responded in length to Vitalik Buterin’s recent assault on centralized exchanges — the Ethereum Co-Founder stated he hoped they would “burn in hell.”

As chief whip at the largest (centralized) cryptocurrency exchange in the world, Zhou took to Twitter to reject Buterin’s stance:

The comment was made during Buterin’s interview on July 6th, 2018 with TechCrunch, where he stated:

“I definitely personally hope centralized exchanges burn in hell as much as possible.”

Elaborating, the Russian-Canadian programmer criticized the ability of centralized exchanges (CEXs) to promote (or demote) cryptocurrencies by charging multi-million dollar listing fees — or what he described as “stupid king-making power”.

While exchanges cannot be solely responsible for a token’s financial gain, many would point to a strong correlation. After listing on Binance within hours of completing its ICO, Quarkchain’s token, for one, increased more than 1200% in valuation in hours.

Accusing the Quarkchain team of price manipulation, one user tweeted:

CZ Strikes Back

To many, Zhou’s response will have dual-purpose: reading as an appeal for more civility in the cryptocurrency “eco-system”, while highlighting the flaws of Buterin’s argument.

In defense of his livelihood,  Zhou argued that centralized exchanges are in fact a vital component of the burgeoning decentralized economy. According to Zhou, by providing increased liquidity of cryptocurrencies — centralized exchanges “probably” accelerate the growth of the entire industry “by more than 10x”.

Pointing out the advantages of centralized exchanges (such as Binance), Zhou wrote:

1. All coins will have far less liquidity (and market cap/price/influence/impact/etc).
2. The industry will be smaller
3. The industry will develop slower.

Going on, Zhou dismissed the immediate advantages of decentralization, while suggesting Buterin may have affected some “king-making” of his own. He writes:

“There is no absolute decentralization. Projects with core teams still have centralization. Today, Vitalik probably has more king-like powers than anyone else in this industry, and has used it, by serving as advisors to projects, therefore helped to decide their fate, at least fate of their ICOs to a large extent.”

As director of a centralized exchange anticipating $1 billion in profits in 2018, Zhou would presumably feel the heat of Buterin’s comments. Yet, the statement’s divisive ‘centralized vs. decentralized’ tone would also seem to threaten Zhou — who closed his response pensively:

We need to keep a view of moving the entire eco-system forward, not just one part of it over another.

Cover Photo by Marc Szeglat on Unsplash

Disclaimer: Our writers' opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies.

Did you like this article? Join us.

Get blockchain news and crypto insights.

Join Us on Telegram

Jonnie Emsley is a freelance writer and blockchain enthusiast based in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Discovering new corners of Southeast Asia and emerging cryptocurrencies give him a buzz like none other.

View author profile