Vitalik Buterin discusses the values and ideas that formed Ethereum 2.0 ๐จ This article is 4 years old...
News โธ Ethereum โธ Technology
Vitalik Buterin discusses the values and ideas that formed Ethereum 2.0
4 min read
Updated: Jul. 5, 2023 at 11:09 pm UTC
Cover art/illustration via CryptoSlate. Image includes combined content which may include AI-generated content.
With Ethereum 2.0 expected to ship in the near future, the values that underlie the worldโs second-largest blockchain have become increasingly important. Vitalik Buterin, one of the creators of Ethereum, discussed both the abstract and the technical aspects of the values that went into designing Ethereum over six years ago and how they are going to shape the networkโs upcoming iteration.
The political values that shaped Ethereum 2.0
Those not familiar with the depths of the crypto industry might not be aware of what goes behind the scenes of the industryโs biggest projects. Ethereum, as the foundation of the DeFi sector and the second-largest network in terms of market cap, tends to reveal unexpected depths when its surface is scratched.
Aside from being based on a very serious mathematical and cryptographical foundation, the network is also supported by a strong pillar of philosophical ideas and valuesโsome of which managed to translate very well into other projects built upon Ethereum.
Vitalik Buterin, one of the creators of Ethereum, took a look back at the values that shaped the design of Ethereum over six years ago and their effect on the networkโs upcoming iteration. Buterin spoke on the Bankless podcast earlier this week, giving a mix of highly technical and very abstract answers to some of the most prevailing questions regarding Ethereum.
One of the biggest questions regarding Ethereum was checked off the list at the very beginning of the interview. Buterin addressed the increased skepticism a part of the community had regarding the launch of Ethereum 2.0, saying that it is โgoing to be shipped as advertised.โ Phase 0 of the launch will come by the end of the year, offering almost every functionality of Ethereum 2.0 aside from sharding, he explained, adding that the following phase, phase 1, will ship much sooner than people think.
Building Ethereum 2.0 from the ground up wasnโt an easy task. Buterin discussed, in length, the political values that went into designing Ethereum 2.0 and how they will affect the final functionality and design of the product.
โProof-of-stake is a philosophically complex thing that binds multiple objectives,โ he said.
The first and most important one of these objectives is combating the incredible amounts of waste and inefficiencies seen in the proof-of-work model that Bitcoin pioneered. By moving away from proof-of-work and transitioning into a proof-of-stake model, the network will also be able to address the growing concern of centralization.
Proof-of-stake, Buterin explained, tries to be โmaximally democraticโ and open for participation. He believes that Ethereum should be seen as a publicly accessible global architecture that people can easily interact with without any intermediaries and with a low barrier of entry. Proof-of-stake, he went on, encourages this culture of participation.
Choosing decentralization is the best long-term solution for blockchain technology
While proof-of-stake might seem like an obvious solution for Ethereum now, choosing a decentralized model when working with a blank slate isnโt always an easy decision. When asked why a decentralized model was chosen for Ethereum back in 2014 when the idea about a programmable blockchain first occurred to Buterin, he said that it wasnโt an easy decision.
Taking a more centralized approach towards building a network is bound to yield great results in the short-term, he said. However, it tends to end up โreally biting you in the long-term.โ One of the best examples of a road to hell paved with good intentions is Steem, whose highly centralized model led to a huge crisis after the project got acquired by Tron. A crisis which, despite the communityโs best effort, led to a chaotic fork and complete devaluation of Steemโs native asset. Buterin also mentioned EOS as an example of a projectโs centralized model turning out to be a bad decision in the long-term, saying that the small number of delegates on the network lead to bribing attacks.
In the long-term, he said, users will always value permisionlessness and decentralization, which is why Ethereum chose the road less traveled.
However, Buterin was clear that there were other projects that wholeheartedly embraced these values as well. He noted that a lot of smaller chains in the Bitcoin Core expanded universe are currently trying to implement these values to various extents. Ethereum Classic, Ethereumโs first fork, is also a chain that values these ideas, Buterin admitted but added that it was taking a more purist approach than Ethereum was.
The issue of chain relativism
The relatively high number of projects aiming for the amount of decentralization Ethereum 2.0 is isnโt a totally positive development for the market. Buterin believes that the number of projects going in this direction is much larger than the number of projects the market can realistically support. This means that while many chains will most likely fail, the ones that do survive will certainly impact the market for many years.
But, the values propagated by Ethereum 2.0 arenโt reserved only for future projects. Buterin noted that the streamlined vision of decentralization has already managed to translate very well to various projects, with the best example of this being Uniswap.
Uniswap, according to Buterin, is a very value-driven project that succeeded in building a simple and easy to use decentralized exchange at a time when most other similar projects were going for complexity. With a minimal interface and a lack of things considered by many to be crucial for exchanges, such as order books, Uniswap continues to cement the things Ethereum holds as the most importantโavailability, simplicity, and decentralization.
However, the number of projects embracing the core values of Ethereum and Ethereum 2.0 doesnโt mean that they will be the ones that prevail on the market. Asked about chain relativism and whether all chains should be seen as equal, Buterin noted that the risk didnโt come from having many projects sharing the same values, but having projects that have none. Having chains that market the idea that core values behind a blockchain arenโt important is something that could have serious consequences on the market and should be something users focus on.
Mentioned in this article
Posted In: Ethereum, Technology
Latest Ethereum Stories
Featured Story
Advertise Here
In this article
Ethereum is a decentralized, open-source blockchain platform that enables the creation of smart contracts and decentralized applications (DApps).
Ethereum Classic
$21.9551
Ethereum Classic (ETC) is a continuation of the original Ethereum blockchain – the classic version preserving untampered history prior to the July 2016 DAO hack..
Uniswap
$8.38161
Since its inception, the Uniswap Protocol (“Uniswap”) has served as a trustless and highly decentralized financial infrastructure.
Steem
$0.18729
Steem is a blockchain-based social media platform where anyone can earn rewards by posting relevant content, curating quality content by upvoting and by holding Steem based currencies in a vest fund, which generates interest..
EOS
$0.54137
EOS is a blockchain protocol that enables horizontal scaling of decentralized applications, allowing developers to efficiently create high performance distributed applications..
Designed with simplicity in mind, the Uniswap protocol provides an interface for seamless exchange of ERC20 tokens on Ethereum.
Vitalik Buterin stands as the pioneering force behind Ethereum, a transformative community-driven platform that fuels the cryptocurrency ether (ETH) and underpins a myriad of decentralized applications.