Prop-firm fees are at risk, most participants do not reach a payout, and simulated funding does not necessarily represent live firm capital. This review is informational, not financial advice.
OneFunded Overview
OneFunded Screenshots
Screenshot 1 of 8
OneFunded Pros and Cons
Pros
- Static drawdown on every plan, never trails
- $29 entry on the two-step Value plan
- Core fee return CLAIMED at first payout
- Three platform options at no extra charge
- 20% code applies to every plan and every size
Cons
- Add-on costs shown only at checkout
- Small Core/Value cap starts when funded
- Payout evidence CLAIMED, the firm own feed
- Same forex lot: $3.50 cTrader, $4.00 MT5
- Instant: 1% exposure, hard breach, no refund
Discount and Offers
AUGUST20 takes 20% off every purchasable package with no exclusions. Add-ons stay on list, so the discounted plan costs 0.8P and the 90% split add-on costs 0.2P. Buying both costs the undiscounted fee P. On Value 5K that is $23.20 plus $5.80 for $29.00. The homepage promotes a second code, AWARD, at 30% with a copy button, and the checkout answers “This code has expired.” The 20% discount is a recurring observed promotion: JULY20, JUNE20 and MAY20 all return expired at 20%. A discount never moves a score.
| Code | Discount | Applies to | Verified | Expires |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUGUST20 | 20% | Every purchasable package, add-ons excluded | 16 August 2026 | No expiry published |
| AWARD | 30% advertised on the homepage | — | 16 August 2026 — checkout rejects it as expired | Already expired while still promoted |
How the Challenge Works
OneFunded sells four challenge families. Flash is the single-phase route, one of the one-step evaluation formats in this category. Core and Value are two-step, and Instant is the firm’s entry among firms that skip the evaluation entirely. The homepage headline reads “Just one step to a funded account”. The live catalog contains six one-step packages, eleven two-step packages and four instant packages, and the site marks the two-step Core family as popular.
After a pass, KYC closes within 30 days, a risk-management review follows, the contract is emailed within 48 hours, and the account is issued within 2 business days. Instant skips the phases and goes straight to that gate.
Instant provides immediate funded access but costs more at entry than either two-step family. Its established disadvantages are a CLAIMED 60% split against 80%, no CLAIMED fee return at any payout, a $50,000 account cap, a 3% daily limit, a 1% exposure cap and a 6% drawdown buffer against Core’s 10%.
The OneFunded Trader Account Explained
OneFunded Trader is the firm’s own name for the funded account. No single public document comprehensively sets out its terms, and the funded contract is unavailable before KYC.
What the Funded Contract Adds
The public help center says the inactivity window halves from 60 days to 30 the moment an account is funded, and a breach there forfeits the refund and any CLAIMED payout bonus. The published stop-loss policy starts affecting CLAIMED payouts at the same point. A stop loss is recommended, not required, but the help center prints the wording its risk team uses, naming consistent no-stop exposure as grounds for a CLAIMED payout review. On Instant, the published Max Exposure rule becomes a hard breach at 1% of floating loss per trade idea, where every other program allows 3% and a three-strike ladder, and the dashboard states a breach triggers immediate deactivation. The funded contract is issued only after KYC and is unavailable before then. Instant is carved out of the Terms and Conditions under a separate service agreement that is also unavailable publicly.
Why the Consistency Rule Starts After Funding on Smaller Core and Value Accounts
On Core and Value at $5,000 to $50,000, the cheapest sizes, the cap is off in both evaluation phases and 50% once funded. Core at $100,000 and $200,000 and Value at $100,000 carry a 50% cap in phase 1, 40% in phase 2 and 30% once funded. Instant runs 20%.
| Program | Evaluation cap | Funded cap |
|---|---|---|
| Core, $5K to $50K | Off | 50% |
| Value, $5K to $50K | Off | 50% |
| Core, $100K and $200K | 50% in phase 1 · 40% in phase 2 | 30% |
| Value, $100K | 50% in phase 1 · 40% in phase 2 | 30% |
| Flash, $5K to $50K | 50% | 50% |
| Flash, $100K and $200K | 50% | 30% |
| Instant | Not applicable | 20% |
Under the published rule, a trader who passes a Core or Value evaluation at $5,000 to $50,000 on one big day has broken no consistency rule of the stage they paid for, and the cap first affects a CLAIMED payout request. No consistency rule is shown on the checkout panel for any of the four products, including inside the detailed six-parameter OneFunded Trader panel that exists to describe the funded account. The published rule says exceeding the cap delays a CLAIMED payout and does not end an account. It says the trader continues trading until later profit dilutes the ratio. One firm we score adds a stricter cap at its funded stage where its evaluation has none, and two more do the same on a single route.
Value
| Phase | Profit target | Daily loss | Maximum drawdown | Minimum days | Time limit | Consistency rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1Note 1 | 8% | 4% | 8% | 4 | None | None |
| Phase 2Note 2 | 6% | 4% | 8% | 4 | None | None |
- The floor is static and measured from the initial balance, so it never moves with profit. It is equity-based, so an open position can breach it. The separate daily limit resets at 00:00 UTC, and three live help articles give two different answers on whether the daily figure is set from balance or equity. Consistency caps the best single day simulated profit as a share of total profit. At $5,000 to $50,000 the consistency rule is off during the evaluation and 50% once funded. At $100,000 it is 50% in phase 1, 40% in phase 2 and 30% funded.
- The floor is static and measured from the initial balance, so it never moves with profit. It is equity-based, so an open position can breach it. The separate daily limit resets at 00:00 UTC, and three live help articles give two different answers on whether the daily figure is set from balance or equity. Consistency caps the best single day simulated profit as a share of total profit. At $100,000 the phase 2 cap is 40%.
A free five-level published ladder qualified on payout cycles, topping out at $737,100 from a $200,000 base account. The firm advertises up to $1M and no published route reaches it. The $200,000 aggregate cap applies to purchased base allocations across accounts before scaling.
Core
| Phase | Profit target | Daily loss | Maximum drawdown | Minimum days | Time limit | Consistency rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1Note 1 | 8% | 5% | 10% | 3 | None | None |
| Phase 2Note 2 | 5% | 5% | 10% | 3 | None | None |
- The floor is static and measured from the initial balance, so it never moves with profit. It is equity-based, so an open position can breach it. The separate daily limit resets at 00:00 UTC, and three live help articles give two different answers on whether the daily figure is set from balance or equity. Consistency caps the best single day simulated profit as a share of total profit. At $5,000 to $50,000 the consistency rule is off during the evaluation and 50% once funded. At $100,000 and $200,000 it is 50% in phase 1, 40% in phase 2 and 30% funded.
- The floor is static and measured from the initial balance, so it never moves with profit. It is equity-based, so an open position can breach it. The separate daily limit resets at 00:00 UTC, and three live help articles give two different answers on whether the daily figure is set from balance or equity. Consistency caps the best single day simulated profit as a share of total profit. At $100,000 and $200,000 the phase 2 cap is 40%.
A free five-level published ladder qualified on payout cycles, topping out at $737,100 from a $200,000 base account. The firm advertises up to $1M and no published route reaches it. The $200,000 aggregate cap applies to purchased base allocations across accounts before scaling.
Flash
| Phase | Profit target | Daily loss | Maximum drawdown | Minimum days | Time limit | Consistency rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EvaluationNote 1 | 10% | 4% | 6% | 1 | None | 50% Daily Profit |
- The floor is static and measured from the initial balance, so it never moves with profit. It is equity-based, so an open position can breach it. The separate daily limit resets at 00:00 UTC. Minimum trading days rise from 1 to 5 at $100,000 and $200,000. The consistency cap is 50% in the evaluation at every size. Once funded it stays 50% at $5,000 to $50,000 and falls to 30% at $100,000 and $200,000.
A free five-level published ladder qualified on payout cycles, topping out at $737,100 from a $200,000 base account. The firm advertises up to $1M and no published route reaches it. The $200,000 aggregate cap applies to purchased base allocations across accounts before scaling.
Instant
| Phase | Profit target | Daily loss | Maximum drawdown | Minimum days | Time limit | Consistency rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FundedNote 1 | — | 3% | 6% | 1 | None | 20% Daily Profit |
- Instant funding, so there is no evaluation phase and no profit target. The floor is static and measured from the initial balance. Max Exposure is 1% floating loss per trade idea and a breach deactivates the account immediately, where every other OneFunded program allows 3% and a three-strike ladder. The access fee is never refunded and the paid split ladder stops at 80%.
A free five-level published ladder qualified on payout cycles, topping out at $737,100 from a $200,000 base account. The firm advertises up to $1M and no published route reaches it. The $200,000 aggregate cap applies to purchased base allocations across accounts before scaling.
Rules and Restrictions
How the OneFunded Core floor stays put
A $100,000 Core example showing a static floor that never moves with profit.
Drawdown is static on every program, measured from the initial balance. No trailing model appears anywhere in the catalog, at any size, on any family. Every program measures drawdown from the initial balance: Flash 6%, Core 10%, Value 8% and Instant 6%. A $100,000 Core account terminates at $90,000 no matter how high the balance went first. The floor is equity-based, so an open position can breach it. The separate daily limit resets at 00:00 UTC and is the rule the help articles define two ways. Every surface agrees on the maximum.
Five contradictions run against the static-drawdown credit, all between the firm’s own live documents on rules governing termination, phase passage or CLAIMED payouts. The contract prohibits closing or modifying positions around high-impact news while the help center permits it. A trader cannot comply with both. The contract bans a second account while the help center allows unlimited accounts to a $200,000 aggregate of purchased base allocations. Three articles give two answers on the daily drawdown basis, initial balance or start-of-day equity, and an archived explainer with the superseded rule is still indexed. One article allows expert advisors with prior approval while another prohibits external software outright. The fifth is the consistency rule’s scope, below.
Where the Consistency Rule Applies
The rule caps the best single day’s simulated profit as a share of total profit. The contract applies it to “all Evaluation phases” while the help center applies it to both stages. That same article then prints a 50% funded cap in its table and 30% in its own worked example. No contract clause states the funded caps on which a CLAIMED payout depends.
News and Weekend Trading
The contract freezes positions around high-impact news and the rulebook permits full activity. Obey the contract. The public rulebook permits positions to be held overnight and over the weekend on every program.
Prohibited Strategies
The banned list covers data freezing, gap trading, latency and reverse arbitrage, tick scalping, cross-account hedging, one-sided bets, martingale and grid systems, unauthorized copy trading and account passing, which is the category standard. Copy trading is allowed between your own OneFunded accounts only, and IP and device region must stay consistent.
Restricted Countries
The contract prohibits 24 jurisdictions, the help center 20, and signup enforces 19. The signup form permits Afghanistan and Myanmar to be selected even though the contract prohibits both. Purchase completion, account issuance and refund outcomes were not tested. Libya and Mali are blocked at signup but missing from the help-center list. No list restricts the USA, and US traders are TradeLocker-only.
| Rule | Limit | Consequence | Applies To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily drawdown, Instant | 3% | Immediate breach, account terminated. Three live help articles give two different answers on whether the daily figure is set from balance or equity | All Stages |
| Daily drawdown, Flash and Value | 4% | Immediate breach, account terminated | All Stages |
| Daily drawdown, Core | 5% | Immediate breach, account terminated | All Stages |
| Max drawdown, Flash and Instant, static | 6% | Immediate breach, permanent. Measured from the initial balance and equity-based, so an open position can breach it | All Stages |
| Max drawdown, Value, static | 8% | Immediate breach, permanent. Measured from the initial balance and equity-based | All Stages |
| Max drawdown, Core, static | 10% | Immediate breach, permanent. Measured from the initial balance and equity-based | All Stages |
| Consistency, best single day as a share of total profit, 50% cap on Flash evaluation and funded Core and Value at $5K to $50K | 50% | Blocks a phase pass or a payout, and never terminates. Caps run by stage and account size. The contract applies it to all evaluation phases while the help center applies it to both stages, and that article prints a 50% funded cap in its table and 30% in its own worked example | All Stages |
| Max exposure, floating loss per trade idea | 3% | Two soft breaches, then a final warning and a review. On Instant the limit is 1% and the consequence is immediate deactivation | All Stages |
| Max margin utilization across open positions | 50% | Two soft breaches, then a final warning and a risk and payout review | All Stages |
| Inactivity, evaluation | 60 calendar days | Account closed, with no refund and no payout. One trade is required in the period | Evaluation |
| Inactivity, funded | 30 calendar days | Account closed, with no refund and no payout. One trade is required in the period | Funded |
| News trading, window around high-impact releases | 10 Minutes around a high-impact release | The contract and the rulebook state opposite rules, up to termination. The contract freezes positions and the rulebook permits full activity | All Stages |
| Multiple accounts | $200,000 | Suspension or termination of all accounts. The contract bans them while the FAQ allows unlimited accounts up to $200,000 in purchased base allocations | All Stages |
Prohibited Strategies
- Data freezing
- Gap trading
- Latency arbitrage
- Reverse arbitrage
- Tick scalping
- Cross-account hedging
- One-sided bets
- Martingale and grid systems
- Unauthorized copy trading. Copying is allowed only between a trader own OneFunded accounts, and IP and device region must stay consistent
- Account passing
Marketing vs. Contract
Marketing language is checked against the terms that govern the selected program.
Pricing and Account Sizes
Pricing is a one-time access fee from $29 to $899, which puts the Value entry among low-cost prop firm evaluations. The fee presents MetaTrader 5, cTrader and TradeLocker as platform options with no activation, data or subscription charge, and the checkout total is labeled “Fees and taxes included.” Public pages do not establish whether one fee grants simultaneous platform access or requires a platform choice. The refund window is three working days, on billing error or no trading activity only. No reset product exists, so failure requires a new purchase to which the then-live code may apply.
Three charges were not found on the homepage, contracts, checkout before add-on selection or 92 captured help articles: the 90% split add-on at +20% of the fee, CLAIMED weekly payouts at +25%, and a bundle of both. All three appear during add-on selection and all three are charged on the undiscounted fee. “Low commission” is one of four homepage feature claims, and no rate accompanies it on the homepage or its four language versions, either contract format, checkout before add-on selection or the 92 of at least 163 help articles we captured. The rates live inside the platforms, and they differ. The same forex lot costs $3.50 on cTrader and $4.00 on MT5, 14.3% apart, and neither figure nor the difference was found on the reviewed surfaces where a trader chooses a platform. The rulebook confirms commissions and swap charges count toward the daily drawdown that terminates accounts, and the observed MT5 specification did not display its swap rate.
Instant provides immediate funded access. Its CLAIMED split is 60% where the other three families are 80%, its fee is never returned at a CLAIMED payout, and the account caps at $50,000. Its paid ladder runs 70% at +20% of the fee and 80% at +30%, so Instant never reaches 90% at any level. It keeps the firm’s static 6% drawdown but has a 3% daily limit and a 1% exposure cap.
Unresolved Before Purchase
OneFunded publishes no TradeLocker commission schedule, and no comparable spreads or swaps for any of the three platforms. OneFunded does not say whether the quoted cTrader and MT5 lot commissions are per side or round trip, what the bundle costs, whether add-ons are refundable, or whether one fee grants simultaneous platform access or requires a platform choice. The practical effect of the CLAIMED $10,000 per-request payout cap on larger balances is not explained. Direct support channels and hours were not established, and no support response test was completed.
| Account balance | Value | Core | Flash | Instant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $29 One-time | $35 One-time | $56 One-time | $79 One-time |
| $10,000 | $59 One-time | $65 One-time | $98 One-time | $139 One-time |
| $25,000 | $99 One-time | $139 One-time | $159 One-time | $249 One-time |
| $50,000 | $199 One-time | $259 One-time | $279 One-time | $349 One-time |
| $100,000 | $349 One-time | $469 One-time | $499 One-time | — |
| $200,000 | — | $799 One-time | $899 One-time | — |
Payouts and Profit Split
Payout Terms
The published terms, classed CLAIMED, set the default split at 80% on Core, Flash and Value and 60% on Instant, and no contract clause states those figures. The 90% split is a paid add-on at +20% of the fee. The CLAIMED $100 minimum and $10,000 per-request payout cap live in one help-center sentence and no contract. Two published CLAIMED method lists do not match. The help center gives Rise, USDT on TRC20 and bank transfer, while the payout interface offers USDC on ERC-20 and BEP20, USDT on ERC-20 only and bank transfer, with Rise absent. The published warning says USDT sent on the wrong network may be unrecoverable. VERIFIED review finding: no payout fee was disclosed on the reviewed homepage, contracts, payout help pages or checkout, so actual payout or transfer charges remain unknown. The homepage CLAIMS “Payment speed: 1h”, but no published document defines it or gives a remedy, where two firms we score publish a CLAIMED $1,000 payment for a missed payout deadline.
| Profit Split | Scaling | Min Payout | Frequency | First Payout After | Methods | Buffer/Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLAIMED: 80% on Core, Flash and Value · 60% on Instant · 90% as a paid add-on at +20% of the fee, and Instant’s paid ladder stops at 80% | CLAIMED: Free five-level ladder to $737,100, qualified on payout cycles | CLAIMED: $100 | CLAIMED: Every 14 days · 7 days as a paid add-on at +25% of the fee | CLAIMED: 14 days after the first position opened on the funded account | CLAIMED: Sources disagree — help center: Rise, USDT (TRC20), bank transfer · payout interface: USDC (ERC-20, BEP20), USDT (ERC-20), bank transfer, no Rise | CLAIMED: None stated |
Payout Evidence
OneFunded’s payout evidence consists of a company-published feed, self-issued certificates and six REPORTED reviews. The feed is the only quantified evidence at scale. No payout was run first-party and no payout evidence reaches VERIFIED. The class for the feed and certificates is CLAIMED. OneFunded CLAIMS “TOTAL PAID TO TRADERS $184,894 in the last 30 days”, with an exact figure of $184,893.52 and a stated average of $1,756.34. The feed places a green “Verified” badge on each row, but company-controlled presentation does not change the evidence class.
The 20 visible rows are a sample totaling $14,420.37. They need not be an exhaustive 30-day ledger and do not test the CLAIMED total. The defensible arithmetic issue is within OneFunded’s own CLAIMED headline metrics: $184,893.52 divided by $1,756.34 equals 105.272 payouts, not a whole-number count. Using the CLAIMED total, 105 payouts would produce a $1,760.89 average and 106 payouts would produce a $1,744.28 average.
| Evidence | Class (VERIFIED / REPORTED / CLAIMED) | Source | Date accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homepage claim: $184,893.52 over 30 days and a $1,756.34 average, implying 105.272 payouts. The 20 visible rows are a sample totaling $14,420.37 | CLAIMED | OneFunded homepage and public statistics feed | 15 August 2026 |
| Self-issued certificates: Max Allocation, Evaluation Success, Payouts | CLAIMED | OneFunded dashboard | 15 August 2026 |
| Roughly six dated reviews describe a payout arriving, most predating the current name, none naming an amount | REPORTED | Trustpilot reviews, December 2024 to April 2026 | 15 August 2026 |
| Five dated reports of passing the evaluation and being refused the funded account, each answered publicly by the firm | REPORTED | Trustpilot reviews, October 2025 to July 2026 | 15 August 2026 |
Scaling Plan
The CLAIMED scaling ladder is free and published: five levels adding 20%, 25%, 30%, 35% and 40% of account size, each gated by three consecutive profitable payout cycles at 6% net or better. The split does not rise with it. The paid add-on remains the only route above 80%. OneFunded CLAIMS “up to $1M”, and its own five levels from the $200,000 maximum base account run $240,000, $300,000, $390,000, $526,500 and $737,100. No account OneFunded sells reaches the advertised $1M on that ladder. The published $200,000 aggregate cap applies to purchased base allocations across accounts and does not replace the separate scaling ceiling.
- Free five-level published ladder, qualified on payout cycles, topping out at $737,100 from a $200,000 base account: 80%
Markets, Platforms, and Trading Conditions
MetaTrader 5, cTrader and TradeLocker are offered as platform options at no extra charge, and they are three different products. Instrument counts differ by platform: 235 on cTrader, 244 on MT5, 252 on TradeLocker. Not one of them lists futures. The firm’s own footnotes exclude MT5 and cTrader in the USA, so US traders get TradeLocker only.
Forex is 55 pairs on cTrader and 39 on both MT5 and TradeLocker, the two lists identical. The homepage’s unqualified “40+ currency pairs” is false for MT5 and TradeLocker, which each list 39, and true for cTrader, which lists 55. The help center’s unqualified “55+ Forex pairs” is supported only by cTrader’s 55-pair list. Assigning either marketing figure to a specific platform is an inference because neither claim names one.
cTrader labels the German index DE40, while MT5 and TradeLocker both label it GER30. The differing labels do not establish different index composition. Of the four indices the homepage lists by ticker, US30 exists on all three, NAS100 on cTrader only, and SPX500 and GER40 on none, with every platform quoting the S&P as US500. WTI and Brent crude trade on MT5 and cTrader and do not exist on TradeLocker, the one platform US traders can use, while the homepage Commodities card advertises Crude Oil with no platform named.
The commission rates were not found on the homepage, contracts, checkout before add-on selection or 92 captured help articles. cTrader shows a full schedule without a login: $3.50 a lot on forex and oil, $7.00 on metals, $0.25 on indices, $0.02 on equities, with crypto and natural gas billed per million dollars of volume at $0.00. MT5 prints $4.00 a lot on forex, identical on all ten pairs resident in the terminal, and the observed specification displayed no swap rate. OneFunded does not state whether the quoted lot commissions are per side or round trip. The rulebook counts swap charges toward the daily drawdown that terminates accounts. Crypto runs as synthetic CFDs on a simulated account at 1:2, not the direct exposure prop firms with exchange-executed crypto offer.
OneFunded sets leverage per asset class and per platform: forex 1:100, indices and commodities 1:30, crypto 1:2, and stocks 1:2 on TradeLocker against 1:100 on MT5 and cTrader. The checkout prints a flat 1:100 on every product. That figure is correct for forex on all three platforms and stocks on MT5 and cTrader, but wrong for indices, commodities and crypto everywhere, plus stocks on TradeLocker. The forex setting lines OneFunded up with other forex prop firms.
Legitimacy and Safety
OneFunded operates with no regulator supervising it, the default across this category and no adverse reading on its own. The contract names Brynex Tech Limited, UK company 15918986, under the law of England and Wales with exclusive English jurisdiction, and no other firm we score has an English-governed contract on record. Companies House shows it active, filings current, with no charges, strike-off or insolvency action. The terms state the firm is not FCA authorized and that neither FSCS nor the Financial Ombudsman applies, while card chargeback rights are preserved. The governing-law clause provides a clear forum, but exclusive English jurisdiction can burden traders outside England and Wales. The reviewed contract names Brynex Tech Limited. OneFunded Capital Ltd of Saint Lucia is separately stated to serve MT5 traders, and the firm formerly operated as PROP365.
The Trustpilot profile displays no rating over 228 reviews, checked 15 August 2026. The transparency tab is more specific: 162 reviews in the past twelve months, 73 of them invited, and of 10 reviews OneFunded reported, 8 came down because the reviewer never answered Trustpilot rather than because the objection was upheld. Above all of it sits the notice, in full: “This company’s rating is unavailable due to a breach of our guidelines.” and “Breach of guidelines — We’ve removed a number of fake reviews for this company.” It names no breach, gives no date, and never says who wrote the removed reviews, so nothing in that wording separates a firm that bought fake reviews from one that was hit by them. Four of the nine peer profiles checked, out of the ten firms we score, carry the same notice.
Five REPORTED trader reviews, posted between 7 October 2025 and 1 July 2026, describe passing the evaluation and being refused the funded account. The firm answers each in public, citing profit concentration, risk-management rules or automated execution software, and offering a free retry every time — one reply states the trader was later funded. None produces evidence, and the “2% risk management” standard cited in one reply occurs zero times across the 92 captured help articles and both contract formats. A sixth REPORTED review describes an account closed while approaching a first payout. Five is the smallest such cluster in the peer set, and our rubric treats rejection after passing as category-common.
OneFunded replies to every negative review located on its own profile, citing the rule at issue each time. Separately, it announced the acquisition of FXCI on 13 November 2025. Companies House confirms that FXCI Challenge Ltd, UK company 15068590, was dissolved by voluntary strike-off on 28 July 2026, but the public filings do not establish the structure of OneFunded’s announced transaction. The asset, customer-book or other transaction structure could not be verified from those filings.
Alternatives
FundedNext’s refundable evaluations are the structural twin of OneFunded’s fee-return ladder, and it publishes a CLAIMED 24-hour payout deadline with a CLAIMED $1,000 remedy if it is missed, alongside a displayed Trustpilot rating where OneFunded’s profile shows none. Crypto Fund Trader’s instant accounts climb from 50% to 90% on performance where OneFunded’s Instant stops at 80%, and it publishes its full commission schedule on its own site where OneFunded’s rates were found only inside the platforms. Crypto Fund Trader has been on FINMA’s warning list since August 2024, and its Trustpilot profile displays no rating either.
Breakout’s never-trailing drawdown runs on every plan it sells, the same structure OneFunded has, from a $20 entry and with CLAIMED payouts in stablecoins.
Final Verdict
OneFunded combines static drawdown on every program with material gaps in pre-purchase disclosure. The floor is static on every program, never trailing, and one other firm we score matches it. Against that, the same forex lot costs $3.50 on cTrader and $4.00 on MT5 with neither figure found on the homepage, contracts, checkout before add-on selection or 92 captured help articles, the smaller Core and Value funded-stage consistency rule is missing from the six-parameter panel that sells it, and the only quantified payout evidence at scale is the firm own feed, classed CLAIMED, whose stated total and average imply 105.272 payouts, not a whole-number count.
No trailing model anywhere in the catalog · Three platform options at no extra charge · Free published scaling ladder, five levels
Prop-firm fees are at risk, most participants do not reach a payout, and simulated funding does not necessarily represent live firm capital. This review is informational, not financial advice.
Evaluation trading carries a substantial risk of losing the fees paid. Participants may lose their evaluation fee and never reach a payout. Simulated accounts are not deposits of real trading capital, and passing an evaluation is not employment or an investment return. Nothing in this review is financial advice. CryptoSlate may earn a commission through links on this page and may receive complimentary evaluation accounts for testing. This never affects scores.
Scoring methodology
The overall score is calculated from seven fixed categories whose weights remain consistent across prop-firm reviews.
The seven weights below are the same for every prop firm we score, and OneFunded’s weighted contributions total 6.000. Each charge is counted once. The CLAIMED payout feed is scored in the payout pillar, and its badge takes no second deduction under firm transparency. OneFunded sits mid-table among the ten firms we score, a tenth above the two at 5.9 and a tenth below the next firm up, and it is ahead of the two beneath it on CLAIMED payout evidence and firm transparency and behind them on trading conditions.
| Category | Weight | Assessment | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Payout Reliability and Evidence | 25% | Class CLAIMED. The firm own feed is the only quantified evidence at scale, and its total and average imply 105.272 payouts, not a whole number. | 5.5 out of 10 |
| Rules Fairness and Transparency | 20% | Static drawdown on every program, a credit one of nine peers can match. Cancelled by five contradictions across live documents on termination and payouts. | 5.5 out of 10 |
| Cost and Value | 15% | A $29 entry with the verified AUGUST20 code and no platform, data or activation charge. Held at 7.0 because no commission rate appears on any reviewed surface. | 7.0 out of 10 |
| Trading Conditions | 15% | Three platforms, 235 to 252 instruments, five asset classes. Held at 7.0 because headline instrument claims change by platform and checkout leverage is wrong. | 7.0 out of 10 |
| Profit Split and Scaling | 10% | An 80% default on three of four products and a free five-level ladder to $737,100. Pulled back by Instant at 60% and split terms no contract clause states. | 6.5 out of 10 |
| Firm Transparency and Stability | 10% | A named UK company, its number and English governing law stated consistently and confirmed active. Deducted for inconsistent pre-purchase rules and a hidden funded contract. | 5.0 out of 10 |
| Support and Reputation | 5% | A detailed reply citing the rule on every negative review located, the top of the peer set, on one of its smallest review bases and with no displayed rating. | 5.5 out of 10 |
| Weighted total | 6.0 out of 10 | ||
FAQ
OneFunded FAQs
Is OneFunded a good prop firm?
Cost and trading conditions are OneFunded’s highest-scoring pillars at 7.0, while transparency is its lowest at 5.0. Static drawdown is its strongest rule feature. Rules and CLAIMED payout evidence are tied at 5.5. The consistency cap begins only after funding on Core and Value accounts from $5,000 to $50,000.
Is OneFunded legit or a scam?
No evidence here proves a scam. OneFunded contracts as Brynex Tech Limited under England and Wales law. It is not FCA authorized, and the FSCS and the Financial Ombudsman do not apply. Trustpilot shows no rating over 228 reviews, checked 15 August 2026. Five REPORTED trader reviews from October 2025 to July 2026 describe passing and then being refused funding.
How much does a $100,000 OneFunded account cost?
Flash costs $499, Core $469 and Value $349 at list, falling to $399.20, $375.20 and $279.20 with the verified AUGUST20 code. The 90% split and CLAIMED weekly payout add-ons are charged on the undiscounted fee.
Who is the founder of OneFunded?
OneFunded does not name a founder on its own site. The Companies House register lists Anna Mohammad as the sole director of Brynex Tech Limited, the company the contract names, appointed on 27 August 2024 with no resignations, and as the only person with significant control at 75% or more of the shares and voting rights. Oleh Sazanskyi held that control until 14 August 2025. The register records a director and a controlling shareholder, which is not the same as naming who founded the brand.
Does OneFunded scale accounts to $1 million?
No. OneFunded CLAIMS up to $1M, and its own five-level ladder tops out at $737,100 from a $200,000 base account. The published $200,000 aggregate cap applies to purchased base allocations across accounts, while scaling has a separate ceiling. No published route reaches $1 million.
What is OneFunded's Trustpilot rating?
No rating is displayed. Trustpilot shows 228 reviews on the profile, checked 15 August 2026, beneath a notice citing a breach of its guidelines and the removal of fake reviews. That notice never says who wrote them. Four of the nine peer profiles checked show the same thing.
Does OneFunded have a discount code?
Yes. AUGUST20 takes 20% off any package, confirmed at the live checkout on 16 August 2026, with add-ons charged at list. AWARD is displayed on the homepage at 30% with a copy button, and the checkout refuses it as expired.
Does OneFunded pay out?
OneFunded CLAIMS $184,893.52 paid over 30 days and a $1,756.34 average. Those figures imply 105.272 payouts, not a whole-number count. The visible 20-row sample totals $14,420.37 but need not represent the complete 30-day ledger. The feed is classed CLAIMED because no payout was run first-party. Roughly six dated reviews, classed REPORTED, describe a payout arriving, none naming an amount. A trader refused at the funding gate never enters the CLAIMED payout record.