Crypto Law Profile

Mexico LFPIORPI Article 17 XVI Virtual Asset AML Regime

Mexico treats certain virtual-asset exchange, custody, storage, and transfer services by non-financial entities as AML/CFT vulnerable activities with SAT registration, client identification, and notice thresholds.

Mexico Effective Act Sep 9, 2019

At a glance

Jurisdiction Mexico federal AML/CFT law for virtual-asset exchange, custody, storage, and transfer services.
Status In force; Article 17 XVI was revised by the DOF reform published July 16, 2025.
Notice triggers Avisos apply at 210 UMA per client operation or 4 UMA service consideration.
Regulators SHCP administers the law; SAT handles registry/notices; UIF uses reports for AML/CFT analysis.

Overview

Mexico’s LFPIORPI Article 17, Fraction XVI virtual asset AML regime is the federal anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing framework that treats specified virtual-asset services as Actividades Vulnerables. As of June 30, 2026, the regime is in force. The provision was added through the 2018 financial technology reform, became operative for virtual-asset activities in 2019, and was materially revised by the 2025 LFPIORPI reform.

Key provisions of LFPIORPI Article 17 XVI

Article 17, Fraction XVI covers the habitual and professional offering of virtual-asset exchange by persons other than financial entities when carried out through electronic, digital, or similar platforms that administer or operate the service, facilitate or conduct purchases or sales for customers, or provide means to custody, store, or transfer virtual assets. The current text also captures operations carried out with Mexican citizens from another jurisdiction.

The provision defines a virtual asset as electronically registered value used among the public as a means of payment for legal acts and transferable only through electronic means. It excludes Mexico’s legal tender, foreign currencies, and assets denominated in legal tender or foreign currency. The article also links certain authorization questions to whether Banco de México recognizes assets under Mexico’s Fintech Law.

Notice thresholds and reporting architecture

The current notice triggers are expressed in UMA. Covered virtual-asset activity is identified in all cases, while notices to the Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público are triggered when a client or user operation equals or exceeds 210 UMA, or when the service consideration charged equals or exceeds 4 UMA. A 2026 amendment to the LFPIORPI Regulation clarifies that, where an operation meets both Article 17 XVI notice triggers, only the notice under the operation-amount trigger is filed.

  • Covered providers are expected to register as persons conducting a vulnerable activity through the SAT-administered portal.
  • Article 18 duties include identifying clients or users, collecting beneficial-owner information where applicable, preserving records, and submitting notices.
  • The 2025 reform added a virtual-asset-specific duty to obtain, maintain, and make available precise information about the originator, recipient, and, where applicable, beneficial owner of virtual-asset operations, as detailed in general rules.

Status and timeline

The virtual-asset activity became an Article 17 vulnerable activity on September 9, 2019, according to Mexico’s official anti-money-laundering portal. SAT later advised that virtual-asset notices should be submitted from April 2, 2020, under the then-applicable 645 UMA threshold. The 2025 reform revised Article 17 XVI, reduced the operation notice threshold to 210 UMA, added the 4 UMA service-consideration trigger, and added cross-border wording for operations with Mexican citizens.

The 2025 decree generally entered into force on July 17, 2025, the day after publication. However, the decree’s transitory provisions state that new Article 18 obligations in fractions VII to XI enter into force on dates established by updated general rules. Editors should verify the latest SHCP, SAT, and UIF publications before treating those rule-dependent duties as fully operative.

Regulators and jurisdictional impact

The regime applies at the federal level in Mexico. SHCP is the competent administrative authority for the law, SAT maintains the vulnerable-activity registry and receives notices, and UIF is the financial-intelligence authority that uses the information for AML/CFT purposes. The provision is relevant to crypto exchanges, custodial wallet providers, transfer platforms, and similar non-financial virtual-asset businesses that fall within the statutory wording.

This profile is a legal-reference summary for editorial and research use. It does not provide legal advice, compliance instructions, tax advice, investment advice, or trading guidance.

Key provisions

Covered virtual-asset services

Covers habitual, professional exchange through digital platforms plus custody, storage, or transfer services by non-financial entities, including services to Mexican citizens from abroad.

AML/CFT Jul 17, 2025 Source

Virtual asset definition

Defines virtual assets as electronically registered value used by the public as payment and transferable electronically, excluding legal tender and foreign currency.

Payments Sep 9, 2019 Source

Notice thresholds

Current thresholds are 210 UMA per client/user operation or 4 UMA for service consideration; SAT lists identification for virtual-asset operations as always.

AML/CFT Jul 17, 2025 Source

Originator and recipient data

Covered persons must obtain, maintain, and make available originator, recipient, and beneficial-owner information for virtual-asset operations, as rules provide.

AML/CFT Jul 17, 2025 Source

Registration and recordkeeping

Covered persons must register as conducting a vulnerable activity, identify clients, preserve records, and submit notices under Article 18 and related rules.

Licensing & Registration Nov 30, 2020 Source

Single notice for dual triggers

The 2026 Regulation states that when Article 17 XVI operation and service-fee notice triggers both apply, the notice is filed under the operation trigger.

AML/CFT Mar 28, 2026 Source

Timeline

  1. LFPIORPI published

    Mexico published the original federal AML law in the Diario Oficial de la Federación.

    Enacted Source
  2. Virtual-asset section added

    The Fintech Law decree added Article 17, Fraction XVI to LFPIORPI.

    Enacted Source
  3. Section XVI entered into force

    SPPLD stated that the virtual-asset vulnerable activity entered into force on this date.

    In force Source
  4. Virtual-asset avisos began

    SAT guidance identified this as the start date for submitting notices for covered virtual-asset operations.

    Effective Source
  5. VASP registration rules updated

    SHCP added Chapter II Bis to the general rules for persons operating with virtual assets.

    In force Source
  6. 2025 LFPIORPI reform published

    The DOF reform revised Article 17 XVI and Article 18 obligations.

    Enacted Source
  7. 2025 reform generally in force

    The decree generally entered into force the day after DOF publication, subject to transitory exceptions.

    In force Source
  8. Regulation amended

    Mexico published amendments to the LFPIORPI Regulation, including Article 31 Bis for dual Article 17 XVI triggers.

    Enacted Source

Who it affects

Actors

Banco de México, Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público, Servicio de Administración Tributaria, Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera

Asset classes

Crypto assets, Virtual assets

Official sources

Editorial note

Profile covers the virtual-asset provision of Mexico’s LFPIORPI Article 17, Fraction XVI. Editors should verify future SHCP, SAT, and UIF rule updates before publication or reuse. This is not legal advice.