Announcing CryptoSlate Research — gain an analytical edge with in-depth crypto insight. Learn more.

Congressional Hearing on ICOs Presents Fractured Stance on US Crypto Regulation

Congressional Hearing on ICOs Presents Fractured Stance on US Crypto Regulation

Cryptos came to Capitol Hill on Wednesday this week, with a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee holding a hearing entitled “Examining Cryptocurrencies and ICO Markets.” The hearing, which marked the first time Congress tackled the regulatory issues surrounding initial coin offerings, highlighted an apparent schism between US lawmakers regarding blockchain technology and digital currencies.

The Wednesday morning hearing presented was largely educational in tone, drawing a range of industry, legal, and academic witnesses, and focused on questions regarding the regulatory parameters governing both cryptocurrencies and initial coin offerings present in the US today.

Congress Divided on Crypto Regulation

Featured at the hearing were witnesses such as Georgetown University law professor Dr. Chris Brummer, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati partner Robert Rosenblum, and Coinbase’s chief legal and risk officer Mike Lempres.

The strong lineup of advisors, however, appeared to provide little context to some of Congress’s less technically-apt members, with Rep. Brad Sherman demonstrating a lack of context regarding the purpose and function of cryptocurrencies:

“A currency is both a store of value… and a medium of exchange … is there any reason why I would need a cryptocurrency to pay for my groceries or anything else that wouldn’t be adequately served by using dollars?”

Democratic Party member Carolyn Maloney presented a critical perspective of digital currencies as a whole, making references to the “inevitable burst” of the cryptocurrency “bubble.” Less-informed positions on the nature of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, however, were balanced by more nuanced perspectives from Representatives such as Tom Emmer, who highlighted the lack of clarity present within the hearing:

“I hear elected officials who don’t have any concept of what we’re dealing with here … talking about ‘we have to go in and regulate.”

Emmer was supported by Rep. Ted Budd, who called attention to the need for a forward-leaning US position on cryptocurrency regulation:

“Regulation in this space is something that the U.S. has to get right, because poor or rushed policy in cryptocurrencies really threatens our reputation in finance and technology.”

Some of the more inflammatory remarks made during the hearing, however, drew ire from the crypto community — specifically, California Rep. Brad Sherman’s statements referring to cryptocurrencies as a “crock”:

“Cryptocurrencies are a crock. They are popular with guys who sit around in their pajamas and tell their wives they’re going to be millionaires.”

The response from the crypto Twittersphere was unsurprising, with many community members taking to the social media platform to vent their frustration with Rep. Sherman’s position.

Overall Positive Sentiment

Despite the divergent viewpoints held by some members of Congress, a large portion of members of the House Capital Markets, Securities and Investment Subcommittee expressed a desire to create a regulatory framework that provides an ecosystem friendly to the development of innovative technological solutions while simultaneously protecting investors.

Rep. Bill Huizenga is a congressman from Michigan.

While  Rep. Bill Huizenga of Michigan — the chairman of the Capital Markets, Securities and Investment subcommittee —declared that “Congress is not going to sit by idly with a lack of protection for investors,” overall sentiment within the hearing appeared to reflect international regulatory stances on cryptocurrency, emphasising a need for increased clarity and understanding in order to ensure the US keeps pace with the rapidly developing blockchain ecosystem.

Wednesday’s hearing was the third Capitol hill event focused on cryptocurrency in the last two months.

The conversation regarding crypto regulation is likely to continue for some time, however, as evidenced by Rep. Bill Huizengas’ closing remarks to the panelists, stating: “I believe that this is probably hello and not goodbye.”

A full webcast of the hearing can be viewed via YouTube:

Cover Photo by Jomar on Unsplash

Filed Under: Analysis, ICOs, Regulation
Sam Town

Sam Town

Samuel is a freelance journalist, digital nomad, and crypto enthusiast based out of Bangkok, Thailand. As an avid observer of the rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem he specializes in the FinTech sector, and when not writing explores the technological landscape of Southeast Asia.

View author profile

Disclaimer: Our writers' opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies.