Part 1 Advanced The Market Maker’s Exchange Checklist (Liquidity, Latency, and Risk Controls) Market makers and HFT desks: evaluate exchanges on execution quality, liquidity, latency, fees, margin, and security — with a WhiteBIT walkthrough. Open guide Crypto Law Profile
Oklahoma Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act (HB 1203)
Oklahoma HB 1203 would have authorized limited state and retirement-fund investments in bitcoin, qualifying large-cap digital assets, and stablecoins. It passed the House but failed in a Senate committee.
At a glance
Bill details
- Bill number
- HB 1203
- Session
- 2025 Regular Session
- Chamber
- House
- Legislative stage
- Failed
Action
- Last action
- Coauthored by Sen. Bullard; prior Senate Revenue and Taxation action recorded failure in committee on Apr. 14, 2025.
- Last action date
- Apr 15, 2025
Sponsor
- Primary sponsor
- Rep. Cody Maynard
- Sponsor party
- Republican
- Co-sponsors
- Sen. Brian Guthrie; Reps. Brian Hill, Daniel Pae, Neil Hays, Stacy Jo Adams, Gabe Woolley, Mike Kelley, Mark Chapman; Sens. David Bullard and Avery Frix.
Source
- Source provider
- State legislature
- Source ID
- HB1203; Session=2500
- State legislature
- Official bill page
Overview
The Oklahoma Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act was House Bill 1203, a 2025 public-finance proposal that would have authorized limited state exposure to bitcoin, qualifying large-cap digital assets, and stablecoins. The bill was not enacted. As of June 9, 2026, Oklahoma’s bill history and public-finance index show HB 1203 failed in a Senate committee after passing the House.
The measure is relevant to Oklahoma’s crypto law profile because it addressed state treasury authority, retirement-fund investment, custody, stablecoin eligibility, and staking. The engrossed version proposed a Nov. 1, 2025 effective date, but that date did not become operative because the bill did not clear the Legislature.
Oklahoma HB 1203: proposed public-fund investment authority
HB 1203 would have permitted, but not required, the Oklahoma State Treasurer to invest specified public funds in bitcoin, digital assets with a market capitalization above $500 billion averaged over the previous calendar year, and stablecoins. The covered public funds were the State General Fund, the Revenue Stabilization Fund, and the Constitutional Reserve Fund.
The bill included an allocation limit. At the time an investment was made, the amount invested in eligible bitcoin, qualifying large-cap digital assets, and stablecoins could not exceed 5% of the total amount of public funds in the relevant account. That cap was framed as an investment ceiling rather than a mandate to purchase digital assets.
Custody, stablecoin, and staking provisions
The engrossed bill would have required digital assets acquired by the covered funds to be held on behalf of the state by a qualified custodian or through an exchange-traded product issued by a registered investment company. It defined a qualified custodian to include certain federally or state-chartered banks, trust companies, special purpose depository institutions, or regulated companies that custody digital assets for an approved exchange-traded product.
Stablecoins were treated separately. The State Treasurer could only hold stablecoins that had received appropriate regulatory approval from the United States or a U.S. state. The bill also would have allowed staking through a third-party solution where the Office of the State Treasurer retained legal ownership of the digital asset.
State retirement fund provisions
HB 1203 also addressed Oklahoma state retirement funds. Under the engrossed text, a state retirement fund could invest in digital assets through exchange-traded products that had been duly registered by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The same 5% account-level limit would have applied at the time of investment.
The retirement-fund language is narrower than the State Treasurer authority because it focuses on exchange-traded products rather than direct custody of bitcoin or other digital assets. For editorial classification, this places the bill primarily under government crypto holdings, custody, stablecoins, and staking rather than a general private-market licensing framework.
Status and legislative timeline
HB 1203 received its first House reading on Feb. 3, 2025, and was referred to House committees on Feb. 4. The House Government Oversight Committee later reported a do-pass recommendation. On Mar. 24, 2025, the House passed the measure on third reading by a vote of 77 to 15 and referred it for engrossment. The bill was engrossed, signed, and transmitted to the Senate on Mar. 25.
In the Senate, HB 1203 was referred to the Revenue and Taxation Committee and then to the Appropriations Committee. Oklahoma’s bill history records “Failed in Committee – Revenue and Taxation” on Apr. 14, 2025. The following day, the history lists Sen. David Bullard as a coauthor, but that later coauthor entry did not change the failed committee status.
Practical effect
Because HB 1203 did not become law, it does not currently create Oklahoma state investment authority, obligations, or compliance requirements for public entities, custodians, retirement systems, or market participants. The profile should be treated as a legislative-reference entry for a failed Oklahoma bill, not as an operative state digital-asset reserve statute.
Key provisions
State Treasurer investment authority
Would permit the State Treasurer to invest specified state funds in bitcoin, qualifying large-cap digital assets, and stablecoins.
Five percent allocation cap
Would cap eligible digital-asset and stablecoin investments at 5% of each covered account at the time an investment is made.
Custody or ETP holding method
Would require acquired assets to be held by a qualified custodian for the state or through an ETP issued by a registered investment company.
Stablecoin approval condition
Would limit stablecoins to those with appropriate regulatory approval from the United States or a U.S. state authority.
State retirement fund ETP authority
Would allow state retirement funds to use SEC- or CFTC-registered ETPs for eligible digital-asset exposure, subject to the 5% cap.
Third-party staking solution
Would allow staking through a third-party solution where the State Treasurer retained legal ownership of the digital asset.
Timeline
First House reading
HB 1203 received first reading in the House; Rep. Cody Maynard was listed as author.
Referred to House committees
Second reading; referred to Government Oversight and Banking, Financial Services and Pensions.
House committee do-pass report
Government Oversight Committee reported the measure do pass.
Passed Oklahoma House
The House passed HB 1203 on third reading, 77-15, and referred it for engrossment.
Sent to Oklahoma Senate
The measure was engrossed, signed, transmitted to the Senate, and received first Senate reading.
Failed in Senate committee
Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee recorded the bill as failed in committee.
Who it affects
Actors
Oklahoma House of Representatives, Oklahoma Legislature, Oklahoma Senate, Oklahoma State Treasurer
Asset classes
Bitcoin, Digital assets, Stablecoins
Official sources
Editorial note
As of June 9, 2026, HB 1203 was not enacted. Oklahoma legislative records show the bill failed in the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee on Apr. 14, 2025.


