Crypto Law Profile

Oklahoma Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act (HB 1203)

Oklahoma HB 1203 would have authorized limited state and retirement-fund investments in bitcoin, qualifying large-cap digital assets, and stablecoins. It passed the House but failed in a Senate committee.

Oklahoma, U.S. Expired Bill

At a glance

Status Failed in Senate committee; not enacted.
Bill HB 1203 in Oklahoma’s 2025 Regular Session.
Covered funds Would cover the State General Fund and two reserve funds.
Investment cap Would cap covered digital-asset investments at 5% per account.

Bill details

Bill number
HB 1203
Session
2025 Regular Session
Chamber
House
Legislative stage
Failed

Action

Last action
Coauthored by Sen. Bullard; prior Senate Revenue and Taxation action recorded failure in committee on Apr. 14, 2025.
Last action date
Apr 15, 2025

Sponsor

Primary sponsor
Rep. Cody Maynard
Sponsor party
Republican
Co-sponsors
Sen. Brian Guthrie; Reps. Brian Hill, Daniel Pae, Neil Hays, Stacy Jo Adams, Gabe Woolley, Mike Kelley, Mark Chapman; Sens. David Bullard and Avery Frix.

Source

Source provider
State legislature
Source ID
HB1203; Session=2500
State legislature
Official bill page

Overview

The Oklahoma Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act was House Bill 1203, a 2025 public-finance proposal that would have authorized limited state exposure to bitcoin, qualifying large-cap digital assets, and stablecoins. The bill was not enacted. As of June 9, 2026, Oklahoma’s bill history and public-finance index show HB 1203 failed in a Senate committee after passing the House.

The measure is relevant to Oklahoma’s crypto law profile because it addressed state treasury authority, retirement-fund investment, custody, stablecoin eligibility, and staking. The engrossed version proposed a Nov. 1, 2025 effective date, but that date did not become operative because the bill did not clear the Legislature.

Oklahoma HB 1203: proposed public-fund investment authority

HB 1203 would have permitted, but not required, the Oklahoma State Treasurer to invest specified public funds in bitcoin, digital assets with a market capitalization above $500 billion averaged over the previous calendar year, and stablecoins. The covered public funds were the State General Fund, the Revenue Stabilization Fund, and the Constitutional Reserve Fund.

The bill included an allocation limit. At the time an investment was made, the amount invested in eligible bitcoin, qualifying large-cap digital assets, and stablecoins could not exceed 5% of the total amount of public funds in the relevant account. That cap was framed as an investment ceiling rather than a mandate to purchase digital assets.

Custody, stablecoin, and staking provisions

The engrossed bill would have required digital assets acquired by the covered funds to be held on behalf of the state by a qualified custodian or through an exchange-traded product issued by a registered investment company. It defined a qualified custodian to include certain federally or state-chartered banks, trust companies, special purpose depository institutions, or regulated companies that custody digital assets for an approved exchange-traded product.

Stablecoins were treated separately. The State Treasurer could only hold stablecoins that had received appropriate regulatory approval from the United States or a U.S. state. The bill also would have allowed staking through a third-party solution where the Office of the State Treasurer retained legal ownership of the digital asset.

State retirement fund provisions

HB 1203 also addressed Oklahoma state retirement funds. Under the engrossed text, a state retirement fund could invest in digital assets through exchange-traded products that had been duly registered by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The same 5% account-level limit would have applied at the time of investment.

The retirement-fund language is narrower than the State Treasurer authority because it focuses on exchange-traded products rather than direct custody of bitcoin or other digital assets. For editorial classification, this places the bill primarily under government crypto holdings, custody, stablecoins, and staking rather than a general private-market licensing framework.

Status and legislative timeline

HB 1203 received its first House reading on Feb. 3, 2025, and was referred to House committees on Feb. 4. The House Government Oversight Committee later reported a do-pass recommendation. On Mar. 24, 2025, the House passed the measure on third reading by a vote of 77 to 15 and referred it for engrossment. The bill was engrossed, signed, and transmitted to the Senate on Mar. 25.

In the Senate, HB 1203 was referred to the Revenue and Taxation Committee and then to the Appropriations Committee. Oklahoma’s bill history records “Failed in Committee – Revenue and Taxation” on Apr. 14, 2025. The following day, the history lists Sen. David Bullard as a coauthor, but that later coauthor entry did not change the failed committee status.

Practical effect

Because HB 1203 did not become law, it does not currently create Oklahoma state investment authority, obligations, or compliance requirements for public entities, custodians, retirement systems, or market participants. The profile should be treated as a legislative-reference entry for a failed Oklahoma bill, not as an operative state digital-asset reserve statute.

Key provisions

State Treasurer investment authority

Would permit the State Treasurer to invest specified state funds in bitcoin, qualifying large-cap digital assets, and stablecoins.

Government Crypto Holdings Source

Five percent allocation cap

Would cap eligible digital-asset and stablecoin investments at 5% of each covered account at the time an investment is made.

Government Crypto Holdings Source

Custody or ETP holding method

Would require acquired assets to be held by a qualified custodian for the state or through an ETP issued by a registered investment company.

Custody Source

Stablecoin approval condition

Would limit stablecoins to those with appropriate regulatory approval from the United States or a U.S. state authority.

Stablecoins Source

State retirement fund ETP authority

Would allow state retirement funds to use SEC- or CFTC-registered ETPs for eligible digital-asset exposure, subject to the 5% cap.

Government Crypto Holdings Source

Third-party staking solution

Would allow staking through a third-party solution where the State Treasurer retained legal ownership of the digital asset.

Staking Source

Timeline

  1. First House reading

    HB 1203 received first reading in the House; Rep. Cody Maynard was listed as author.

    Introduced Source
  2. Referred to House committees

    Second reading; referred to Government Oversight and Banking, Financial Services and Pensions.

    In committee Source
  3. House committee do-pass report

    Government Oversight Committee reported the measure do pass.

    In committee Source
  4. Passed Oklahoma House

    The House passed HB 1203 on third reading, 77-15, and referred it for engrossment.

    Passed Source
  5. Sent to Oklahoma Senate

    The measure was engrossed, signed, transmitted to the Senate, and received first Senate reading.

    Passed Source
  6. Failed in Senate committee

    Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee recorded the bill as failed in committee.

    Expired Source

Who it affects

Actors

Oklahoma House of Representatives, Oklahoma Legislature, Oklahoma Senate, Oklahoma State Treasurer

Asset classes

Bitcoin, Digital assets, Stablecoins

Official sources

Editorial note

As of June 9, 2026, HB 1203 was not enacted. Oklahoma legislative records show the bill failed in the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee on Apr. 14, 2025.