Crypto Law Profile

CSA Staff Notice 46-308: Securities Law Implications for Offerings of Tokens

Canadian securities regulators’ current staff guidance explains when token offerings—including utility tokens and SAFT structures—may involve securities, emphasizing the investment-contract test, economic reality, prospectus rules, resale limits, and dealer registration.

Canada Effective Agency guidance

At a glance

Instrument type CSA staff guidance interpreting existing securities law; not a standalone statute or rule.
Publication and status Published June 11, 2018; the BCSC currently lists the notice as current.
Core legal test Focuses on investment, common enterprise, expected profit, and significant reliance on others’ efforts.
Primary scope Covers utility-token claims, marketing, secondary trading, SAFTs, prospectus rules, resale limits, and registration.

Overview

CSA Staff Notice 46-308, Securities Law Implications for Offerings of Tokens, is Canadian Securities Administrators guidance published on June 11, 2018. It addresses when an offering of coins or tokens, including products described as “utility tokens,” may constitute a distribution of securities under Canadian provincial and territorial law. The British Columbia Securities Commission currently classifies the notice as current. It is staff guidance rather than a standalone statute or rule and states no separate effective date.

How CSA Staff Notice 46-308 applies securities law to token offerings

The notice supplements CSA Staff Notice 46-307, Cryptocurrency Offerings. CSA staff said most token offerings it had reviewed—including many involving a claimed utility function—had involved securities. A token’s label, technical design, or possible use within software does not settle the issue.

Instead, the notice directs attention to the economic reality of the entire offering and emphasizes substance over form. Its investment-contract analysis asks whether there is an investment of money in a common enterprise, with an expectation of profit significantly dependent on others’ efforts. Each offering must be assessed on its own facts; the examples are not a mechanical checklist.

Investment-contract indicators in token offerings

The notice identifies circumstances that may support one or more elements of an investment contract:

  • an unfinished platform, application, product, or service, leaving purchasers dependent on management’s future work;
  • delayed token delivery or fundraising that finances development, infrastructure, network growth, or marketing;
  • promotional bounty programs, statements about appreciation, comparisons with rising crypto assets, or reliance on management expertise;
  • large management token holdings, pre-mining, limited supply, or purchase amounts misaligned with the stated use; and
  • marketing to people who cannot reasonably use the product, or an expectation of trading on crypto-asset platforms or secondary markets.

The notice also describes facts that may point elsewhere. A token continuously available at a fixed platform value may reduce an expectation of profit. A genuinely free distribution may lack an investment of money, although staff may examine the broader transaction. Unique, non-fungible collectibles whose value does not depend on continued business development may lack a common enterprise. No feature is conclusive by itself.

Secondary trading and token marketing

Expected free trading can strengthen an inference that purchasers anticipate resale profits, especially when liquidity is central to the offering or prominent in marketing. Staff may consider whitepapers, social-media statements, community communications, and third-party claims endorsed by the issuer.

The notice says an issuer’s lack of control over transferability or exchange listing is generally not decisive. Where a token is a security, unrestricted transfers may conflict with securities-law resale restrictions.

SAFTs and multi-step token offerings

CSA 46-308 separately addresses multi-step structures, including a simple agreement for future tokens, or SAFT. Staff states that the initial contractual right to receive a future token is generally a security. Later delivery of a functional token does not end the analysis: the token may remain an investment contract or have other security-like attributes.

When a step involves a security, prospectus requirements apply unless a valid exemption is available. Exempt distributions may carry resale restrictions, and persons in the business of trading securities may face dealer-registration requirements. Noncompliance at the first step is not cured by later steps, and staff expresses concern where staging is used to avoid securities legislation.

Status and Canadian regulatory context

The CSA coordinates Canada’s provincial and territorial securities regulators; the notice therefore explains staff views applied through relevant local legislation and regulators. It also notes that a Canadian authority may assert jurisdiction over trades involving investors elsewhere where a real and substantial connection exists.

As of June 25, 2026, the BCSC lists 46-308 as current, the CSA includes it in its Financial Innovation Hub publications, and joint CSA and CIRO guidance published in December 2025 still cites it when discussing when crypto assets may be securities. No amendment, withdrawal, expiry, or formal effective date was identified in the reviewed official sources. This profile is informational and does not determine the treatment of any particular token or offering.

Key provisions

Economic reality and substance over form

Assess the offering as a whole. A token’s label, technical design, or utility function does not determine whether the offering distributes a security.

Securities Source

Four-part investment-contract analysis

Consider an investment of money, a common enterprise, an expectation of profit, and profits expected to come significantly from the efforts of others.

Regulatory perimeter Source

Utility does not exclude securities treatment

A utility function is not conclusive. Undeveloped products, delayed delivery, capital-raising use, management dependence, and other facts may support investment-contract treatment.

Token issuance Source

Marketing, scarcity, and purchaser profile

Appreciation claims, bounty promotions, limited supply, pre-mining, large purchases, management expertise, or marketing to non-users may support an expectation-of-profit analysis.

Marketing Source

Secondary-market expectations

Expected or promoted trading can indicate anticipated resale profits. Whitepapers, social media, and endorsed third-party statements may be considered.

Secondary trading Source

SAFTs and multi-step structures

A right to future tokens is generally a security. A later functional token may also remain a security, and staging does not displace analysis of the overall economic arrangement.

Token issuance Source

Prospectus, resale, and registration consequences

Where a security is distributed, prospectus requirements or valid exemptions, resale restrictions, and dealer-registration requirements may apply.

Registration Source

Jurisdiction and enforcement

The notice describes surveillance and enforcement and says a Canadian regulator may have jurisdiction where a transaction has a real and substantial connection to that jurisdiction.

Enforcement Source

Timeline

  1. CSA Staff Notice 46-307 published

    The CSA issued foundational guidance on cryptocurrency offerings, later supplemented by Staff Notice 46-308.

    Enacted Source
  2. CSA Staff Notice 46-308 published

    The CSA published additional guidance on utility-token claims, investment contracts, and multi-step token offerings.

    Enacted Source
  3. Later joint guidance cites 46-308

    Joint CSA and CIRO finfluencer guidance continued to cite 46-308 on when crypto assets may be securities.

    Enacted Source

Who it affects

Actors

Canadian Securities Administrators

Asset classes

Crypto assets, Tokens

Official sources

Editorial note

This is CSA staff guidance, not a standalone statute or rule. It explains staff views on how existing provincial and territorial securities laws may apply. “In force” is the nearest available controlled status for current non-U.S. guidance and should not be read as implying that the notice independently creates binding requirements.