Part 1 Advanced The Market Maker’s Exchange Checklist (Liquidity, Latency, and Risk Controls) Market makers and HFT desks: evaluate exchanges on execution quality, liquidity, latency, fees, margin, and security — with a WhiteBIT walkthrough. Open guide Crypto Law Profile
Louisiana HB 619 Treasury Department Digital Assets Bill
Louisiana HB 619 would have authorized the state treasurer to invest up to 5% of the Budget Stabilization Fund in qualifying digital assets and precious metals. The 2026 session adjourned without final passage recorded.
At a glance
Bill details
- Bill number
- HB 619
- Session
- 2026 Regular Session
- Chamber
- House
- Legislative stage
- Dead
Action
- Last action
- Read by title and referred to House Appropriations; scheduled on Apr. 7 agenda, with no later bill action recorded.
- Last action date
- Mar 9, 2026
Sponsor
- Primary sponsor
- Rep. Mark Wright
- Sponsor party
- Republican
Source
- Source provider
- State legislature
- Source ID
- Louisiana Legislature i=250481; HLS 26RS-30
- State legislature
- Official bill page
Overview
Louisiana House Bill 619 was a 2026 state bill concerning the Treasury Department and the Budget Stabilization Fund. As introduced, the measure would have authorized the state treasurer to invest up to 5% of the fund’s balance in qualifying precious metals and digital assets. The bill was filed by Rep. Mark Wright and referred to the House Committee on Appropriations. Because the 2026 Regular Session adjourned on June 1, 2026 without final passage recorded for HB 619, this profile maps the measure as expired for CryptoSlate tracking purposes, while noting that the official bill page still lists its last procedural status as pending House Appropriations.
What Louisiana HB 619 Would Have Authorized
HB 619 proposed to enact Louisiana Revised Statutes 39:94(D), adding a specific investment authority for the Budget Stabilization Fund. The core authorization was narrow: the treasurer could invest an aggregate amount of up to 5% of the fund’s balance in two asset categories. The first was precious metals. The second was digital assets with a market capitalization above $750 billion, averaged over the previous calendar year.
The bill did not create a general digital asset investment mandate. Its language was framed as permissive authority for the treasurer, and the fiscal note likewise described the proposal as authorizing, but not requiring, the investment. The bill would have changed the set of assets available for a portion of the reserve fund, rather than directing an immediate purchase.
Digital Asset Scope and Custody Requirements
The proposed definition of “digital assets” covered assets that exist only in digital form and confer economic, proprietary, or access rights. The text expressly included virtual currency, cryptocurrency, and other natively electronic assets. The bill also defined “exchange-traded product” as a regulated security or financial instrument approved by the SEC, CFTC, or another appropriate regulator, traded on a regulated U.S. exchange, and deriving value from an underlying pool of assets.
HB 619 set out several ways acquired assets could be held. Assets could be held on behalf of the state by a qualified custodian, as an exchange-traded product, through a secure-custody solution for digital assets, or in physical form for precious metals. The custody language included controls around private keys, encryption, access controls, multi-party authorization, audit logs, disaster recovery, independent security audits, and penetration testing.
Relationship to a Constitutional Amendment
The bill included a conditional effectiveness clause. It would become operative only if a related proposed amendment to Article VII, Section 14(B) of the Louisiana Constitution was adopted at a statewide election and became effective. That related measure appears to be HB 603, also by Rep. Wright, which proposed constitutional authority for investment of state funds in digital assets and precious metals. HB 603 advanced further than HB 619, but official records reviewed for this profile show HB 619 remained in House Appropriations.
Status, Fiscal Note, and Editorial Context
The official HB 619 page recorded the bill as pending House Appropriations and scheduled for an April 7, 2026 committee agenda. The agenda page later showed the meeting as adjourned. The bill history lists prefiling on February 26, interim calendar appearance on February 27, and referral to House Appropriations on March 9. No later HB 619 floor passage, Senate action, enrollment, or governor action was found in the official page reviewed for this draft.
The Legislative Fiscal Office fiscal note stated that, as of March 26, 2026, Bitcoin was the only digital asset meeting the bill’s $750 billion threshold. For illustrative purposes, the note assumed a $100 million investment and estimated increased state general fund expenditures of about $2.25 million in fiscal year 2027 through fiscal year 2031. It also flagged custody, transaction, liquidity, audit, insurance, volatility, cyberattack, phishing, and hacking considerations.
Why the Bill Matters for Crypto Law Tracking
HB 619 fits within the broader state-level trend of proposals to authorize public entities to hold or invest in digital assets. Its significance is narrower than a comprehensive crypto licensing regime: it focused on treasury investment authority, reserve-fund asset eligibility, and custody conditions. For CryptoSlate taxonomy, the measure is best tracked under Louisiana, Government Crypto Holdings, Custody, and Market Structure & Regulatory Perimeter, with status mapped to expired after session adjournment pending editorial confirmation.
Key provisions
Budget Stabilization Fund authority
Would authorize the treasurer to invest up to 5% of the fund balance in precious metals and digital assets above the market-cap threshold.
Digital asset eligibility threshold
Digital assets would need market capitalization exceeding $750B, averaged over the previous calendar year.
Custody and holding methods
Assets could be held by qualified custodian, as an exchange-traded product, via secure custody for digital assets, or physically for metals.
Secure custody controls
Secure custody would require encrypted owner-only keys, access controls, multi-party authorization, logs, continuity planning, audits, and testing.
Conditional effectiveness
The act would become operative only if the related Louisiana constitutional amendment was adopted statewide and became effective.
Timeline
HB 619 prefiled
Bill was prefiled for the 2026 Regular Session.
First appeared in Interim Calendar
The bill first appeared in the Interim Calendar.
Referred to House Appropriations
House read the bill by title and referred it to the Committee on Appropriations.
Scheduled on Appropriations agenda
HB 619 appeared on the House Appropriations agenda; the agenda page later showed the meeting adjourned.
2026 Regular Session adjourned
The Legislature adjourned the 2026 Regular Session with no final passage recorded for HB 619 in reviewed records.
Who it affects
Actors
Louisiana Department of the Treasury, Louisiana House Appropriations Committee, Louisiana Legislature, Louisiana State Treasurer, Rep. Mark Wright
Asset classes
Bitcoin, Digital assets, Exchange-traded products, Precious metals
Official sources
Editorial note
As of June 11, 2026, official sources show HB 619 was referred to House Appropriations and that the 2026 Regular Session adjourned on June 1. Status is mapped to Expired pending editor confirmation.


