Crypto Law Profile

Tennessee Digital Asset Mining Rights Act

Tennessee HB2309/SB2370 would have created digital asset mining, node, wallet, payment, custody, and staking protections. It failed after the 2024 session adjourned.

Tennessee, U.S. Expired Bill

At a glance

Status Failed after the 113th General Assembly adjourned; not operative Tennessee law.
Mining scope Would have covered home mining and mining businesses using more than 1 MW at one site.
Local limits Would have restricted mining-specific noise, data-center, and discriminatory zoning rules.
Licensing Would have excluded mining and node operation from Tennessee money-transmission licensing.

Bill details

Bill number
HB2309 / SB2370
Session
2023-2024
Chamber
Multiple
Legislative stage
Failed

Action

Last action
House: Taken off notice for calendar in Commerce Committee.
Last action date
Mar 19, 2024

Sponsor

Primary sponsor
Rep. Kevin Vaughan
Sponsor party
Republican
Co-sponsors
Sen. Bo Watson (Senate companion sponsor).

Source

Source provider
State legislature
Source ID
TN HB2309/SB2370
State legislature
Official bill page

Overview

The Tennessee Digital Asset Mining Rights Act profile covers HB2309/SB2370 from the 113th Tennessee General Assembly, an unenacted proposal introduced as the “Blockchain Basics Act.” The measure would have added a new chapter to Tennessee Code Annotated Title 47 addressing digital assets, home and commercial mining, blockchain nodes, self-custody, staking, and related custody services. As of June 9, 2026, the bill should be treated as failed or expired rather than operative Tennessee law.

Digital asset mining rights proposed in Tennessee

The bill’s mining provisions were designed to distinguish ordinary residential activity from larger industrial operations. The proposed text defined “digital asset mining” as using electricity to power a computer for securing a blockchain network and generating a digital asset. It defined a “digital asset mining business” as a group of computers at a single site consuming more than one megawatt of energy on an average annual basis to secure a blockchain protocol and generate a digital asset.

For individuals, the proposal would have allowed home digital asset mining in residentially zoned areas if the person complied with local noise ordinances. It also would have allowed individuals to operate blockchain nodes, transfer digital assets on a blockchain protocol, exchange one digital asset for another through a protocol, and participate in staking.

Limits on local mining restrictions

The proposed act would have stated that a digital asset mining business may mine in any area zoned for industrial use. Political subdivisions would have been restricted from creating mining-specific sound limits unless those limits matched generally applicable sound-pollution limits for comparable residential or industrial areas. The bill also would have barred local governments from imposing requirements on a digital asset mining business that were not also imposed on data centers in the same jurisdiction.

For zoning changes affecting an area with a digital asset mining business, the proposal required ordinary notice and hearing procedures. It also would have allowed a mining business to appeal a zoning change to a court, with rejection required if the change was made to discriminate against the mining business. These provisions were framed as anti-discrimination rules, not as a general exemption from local land-use, building, environmental, or utility requirements.

Wallets, payments, licensing, and securities treatment

HB2309/SB2370 also included non-mining digital asset provisions. State and local governments would not have been able to prohibit, restrict, or impair an individual’s ability to use a digital asset to purchase legal goods or services, or to use a self-hosted wallet or hardware storage wallet for self-custody. The bill would have blocked taxes or charges based solely on the use of a digital asset as the payment method, while preserving taxes or charges that would otherwise apply to the same transaction using legal tender.

The proposal stated that an individual engaged in home mining, a digital asset mining business, or a node operator would not need a license under Tennessee’s Money Transmission Modernization Act for those activities. It also provided that a business offering digital asset mining services or staking-as-a-service would not be deemed to be offering a security under the Tennessee Securities Act of 1980.

Bank and trust company custody provisions

The bill separately would have amended Tennessee banking law to allow a financial institution or trust company to provide digital asset custody services if it maintained adequate protocols to manage risk and comply with applicable law. The text contemplated use of third-party service providers and required risk management systems, insurance review, and service-provider oversight. It also described nonfiduciary custody, where legal title remains with the customer, and fiduciary custody, where the institution or trust company has fiduciary powers.

Status and legislative timeline

HB2309 was filed on January 29, 2024, with SB2370 as the Senate companion. The House version was referred to the Commerce Committee, advanced from the Business & Utilities Subcommittee with amendment language, and was then taken off notice in the Commerce Committee on March 19, 2024. The 113th Tennessee General Assembly adjourned sine die on April 25, 2024, and NCSL later listed HB2309 and SB2370 as “Failed – Adjourned.” Because the proposal did not become law, the July 1, 2024 effective date in the bill text is not operative.

Key provisions

Digital asset mining definitions

Defined digital assets, digital asset mining, home mining, mining businesses, nodes, wallets, staking, and staking-as-a-service.

Mining Source

Home mining and node operation

Would have allowed home digital asset mining subject to local noise ordinances and allowed individuals to operate blockchain nodes and participate in staking.

Mining Source

Industrial-zoned mining businesses

Would have allowed mining businesses in industrial zones and limited mining-specific local sound, data-center, and zoning restrictions.

Mining Source

Money transmission licensing carveout

Would have stated that home miners, mining businesses, and node operators do not need a Tennessee money transmission license for those activities.

Licensing Source

Self-custody and payment use

Would have protected use of digital assets for legal goods and services and use of self-hosted or hardware wallets for self-custody.

Self-custody Source

Mining and staking services

Would have stated that digital asset mining services or staking-as-a-service are not securities offerings under the Tennessee Securities Act of 1980.

Securities Source

Bank and trust custody services

Would have allowed financial institutions and trust companies to provide digital asset custody with risk controls, insurance review, and oversight.

Custody Source

Timeline

  1. HB2309 filed

    House bill filed for introduction as the Blockchain Basics Act.

    Introduced Source
  2. Referred to Commerce Committee

    House bill passed second consideration and was referred to the Commerce Committee.

    In committee Source
  3. Subcommittee recommended amendment

    Business & Utilities Subcommittee recommended passage if amended and referred the bill to Commerce Committee.

    In committee Source
  4. Taken off Commerce calendar

    House action listed as taken off notice for calendar in the Commerce Committee.

    In committee Source
  5. Session adjourned; bill failed

    The 113th General Assembly adjourned sine die; NCSL later listed HB2309/SB2370 as failed-adjourned.

    Expired Source

Who it affects

Actors

Digital asset miners, Financial institutions, Local governments, Tennessee General Assembly

Asset classes

Cryptocurrency, Digital assets, NFTs, Stablecoins

Official sources

Editorial note

Editorial label. The bill text itself would have cited the proposed chapter as the “Blockchain Basics Act”; this profile focuses on its digital asset mining rights provisions. The proposal did not become law.