Part 1 Advanced The Market Maker’s Exchange Checklist (Liquidity, Latency, and Risk Controls) Market makers and HFT desks: evaluate exchanges on execution quality, liquidity, latency, fees, margin, and security — with a WhiteBIT walkthrough. Open guide Crypto Law Profile
Tennessee Digital Asset Mining Rights Act
Tennessee HB2309/SB2370 would have created digital asset mining, node, wallet, payment, custody, and staking protections. It failed after the 2024 session adjourned.
At a glance
Bill details
- Bill number
- HB2309 / SB2370
- Session
- 2023-2024
- Chamber
- Multiple
- Legislative stage
- Failed
Action
- Last action
- House: Taken off notice for calendar in Commerce Committee.
- Last action date
- Mar 19, 2024
Sponsor
- Primary sponsor
- Rep. Kevin Vaughan
- Sponsor party
- Republican
- Co-sponsors
- Sen. Bo Watson (Senate companion sponsor).
Source
- Source provider
- State legislature
- Source ID
- TN HB2309/SB2370
- State legislature
- Official bill page
Overview
The Tennessee Digital Asset Mining Rights Act profile covers HB2309/SB2370 from the 113th Tennessee General Assembly, an unenacted proposal introduced as the “Blockchain Basics Act.” The measure would have added a new chapter to Tennessee Code Annotated Title 47 addressing digital assets, home and commercial mining, blockchain nodes, self-custody, staking, and related custody services. As of June 9, 2026, the bill should be treated as failed or expired rather than operative Tennessee law.
Digital asset mining rights proposed in Tennessee
The bill’s mining provisions were designed to distinguish ordinary residential activity from larger industrial operations. The proposed text defined “digital asset mining” as using electricity to power a computer for securing a blockchain network and generating a digital asset. It defined a “digital asset mining business” as a group of computers at a single site consuming more than one megawatt of energy on an average annual basis to secure a blockchain protocol and generate a digital asset.
For individuals, the proposal would have allowed home digital asset mining in residentially zoned areas if the person complied with local noise ordinances. It also would have allowed individuals to operate blockchain nodes, transfer digital assets on a blockchain protocol, exchange one digital asset for another through a protocol, and participate in staking.
Limits on local mining restrictions
The proposed act would have stated that a digital asset mining business may mine in any area zoned for industrial use. Political subdivisions would have been restricted from creating mining-specific sound limits unless those limits matched generally applicable sound-pollution limits for comparable residential or industrial areas. The bill also would have barred local governments from imposing requirements on a digital asset mining business that were not also imposed on data centers in the same jurisdiction.
For zoning changes affecting an area with a digital asset mining business, the proposal required ordinary notice and hearing procedures. It also would have allowed a mining business to appeal a zoning change to a court, with rejection required if the change was made to discriminate against the mining business. These provisions were framed as anti-discrimination rules, not as a general exemption from local land-use, building, environmental, or utility requirements.
Wallets, payments, licensing, and securities treatment
HB2309/SB2370 also included non-mining digital asset provisions. State and local governments would not have been able to prohibit, restrict, or impair an individual’s ability to use a digital asset to purchase legal goods or services, or to use a self-hosted wallet or hardware storage wallet for self-custody. The bill would have blocked taxes or charges based solely on the use of a digital asset as the payment method, while preserving taxes or charges that would otherwise apply to the same transaction using legal tender.
The proposal stated that an individual engaged in home mining, a digital asset mining business, or a node operator would not need a license under Tennessee’s Money Transmission Modernization Act for those activities. It also provided that a business offering digital asset mining services or staking-as-a-service would not be deemed to be offering a security under the Tennessee Securities Act of 1980.
Bank and trust company custody provisions
The bill separately would have amended Tennessee banking law to allow a financial institution or trust company to provide digital asset custody services if it maintained adequate protocols to manage risk and comply with applicable law. The text contemplated use of third-party service providers and required risk management systems, insurance review, and service-provider oversight. It also described nonfiduciary custody, where legal title remains with the customer, and fiduciary custody, where the institution or trust company has fiduciary powers.
Status and legislative timeline
HB2309 was filed on January 29, 2024, with SB2370 as the Senate companion. The House version was referred to the Commerce Committee, advanced from the Business & Utilities Subcommittee with amendment language, and was then taken off notice in the Commerce Committee on March 19, 2024. The 113th Tennessee General Assembly adjourned sine die on April 25, 2024, and NCSL later listed HB2309 and SB2370 as “Failed – Adjourned.” Because the proposal did not become law, the July 1, 2024 effective date in the bill text is not operative.
Key provisions
Digital asset mining definitions
Defined digital assets, digital asset mining, home mining, mining businesses, nodes, wallets, staking, and staking-as-a-service.
Home mining and node operation
Would have allowed home digital asset mining subject to local noise ordinances and allowed individuals to operate blockchain nodes and participate in staking.
Industrial-zoned mining businesses
Would have allowed mining businesses in industrial zones and limited mining-specific local sound, data-center, and zoning restrictions.
Money transmission licensing carveout
Would have stated that home miners, mining businesses, and node operators do not need a Tennessee money transmission license for those activities.
Self-custody and payment use
Would have protected use of digital assets for legal goods and services and use of self-hosted or hardware wallets for self-custody.
Mining and staking services
Would have stated that digital asset mining services or staking-as-a-service are not securities offerings under the Tennessee Securities Act of 1980.
Bank and trust custody services
Would have allowed financial institutions and trust companies to provide digital asset custody with risk controls, insurance review, and oversight.
Timeline
HB2309 filed
House bill filed for introduction as the Blockchain Basics Act.
Referred to Commerce Committee
House bill passed second consideration and was referred to the Commerce Committee.
Subcommittee recommended amendment
Business & Utilities Subcommittee recommended passage if amended and referred the bill to Commerce Committee.
Taken off Commerce calendar
House action listed as taken off notice for calendar in the Commerce Committee.
Session adjourned; bill failed
The 113th General Assembly adjourned sine die; NCSL later listed HB2309/SB2370 as failed-adjourned.
Who it affects
Actors
Digital asset miners, Financial institutions, Local governments, Tennessee General Assembly
Asset classes
Cryptocurrency, Digital assets, NFTs, Stablecoins
Official sources
Editorial note
Editorial label. The bill text itself would have cited the proposed chapter as the “Blockchain Basics Act”; this profile focuses on its digital asset mining rights provisions. The proposal did not become law.


