Crypto Law Profile

Japan 2022 Payment Services Act Stablecoin Amendments

Japan’s 2022 PSA amendments created the Electronic Payment Instrument regime for fiat-linked stablecoins, with issuer, intermediary-registration, user-protection and AML/CFT rules.

Japan Effective Act Jun 1, 2023

At a glance

Status In force since June 1, 2023 under implementing orders and guidance.
Jurisdiction Japan; supervised primarily by the Financial Services Agency framework.
Stablecoin category Creates Electronic Payment Instruments for qualifying fiat-linked payment tokens.
Intermediaries EPI service providers must register before providing covered services.

Overview

Japan’s 2022 amendments to the Payment Services Act created the core legal framework for fiat-linked stablecoins that qualify as Electronic Payment Instruments. The amendment act was passed by the Diet on June 3, 2022, promulgated on June 10, 2022 as Act No. 61 of 2022, and implemented through Cabinet Orders, Cabinet Office Orders, notices, supervisory guidance, and AML/CFT measures that generally took effect on June 1, 2023.

As of June 6, 2026, the Electronic Payment Instrument regime is treated here as in force. This profile focuses on the stablecoin and intermediary-registration components of the 2022 amendments and related implementing rules, not on every payment-services change adopted in the same statute.

What the 2022 Payment Services Act amendments changed

The amended Payment Services Act now contains a dedicated chapter for Electronic Payment Instruments. The Act’s purpose clause also refers to exchange of Electronic Payment Instruments and payment-services user protection. For stablecoin analysis, the central legal move is Article 2(5), which defines Electronic Payment Instruments to include certain currency-denominated property value recorded electronically, usable for payment to unspecified persons, purchasable or saleable with unspecified persons, and transferable through an electronic data processing system. The definition also covers specified beneficial interests in a trust and Cabinet Office Order equivalents.

Stablecoin issuer perimeter

The Financial Services Agency describes the regime as focused on “digital-money type stablecoins”: fiat-linked instruments designed to preserve redemption at par. Under the Japanese framework, banks, funds transfer service providers, and trust companies are the issuer categories identified for digital-money type stablecoins. The FSA’s materials distinguish those instruments from crypto-asset-type tokens that do not meet redemption expectations and may be handled under Japan’s crypto-asset rules rather than the Electronic Payment Instrument framework.

This distinction matters for taxonomy. The regime does not treat every token marketed as a stablecoin as an Electronic Payment Instrument. Classification depends on the instrument’s legal rights, transferability, redemption structure, issuer model, and use as a payment or settlement instrument.

Electronic Payment Instrument service providers

The regime creates a registration perimeter for intermediaries. Article 62-3 of the Payment Services Act provides that no person may provide Electronic Payment Instrument services unless registered by the Prime Minister. The application framework requires information such as the relevant business category, the Electronic Payment Instrument handled, the issuer’s name and address, and the details and method of the services. In practice, this captures exchange, brokerage, agency, transfer-related, and management functions around qualifying stablecoins.

User protection, custody, and conduct controls

The amended Act and Cabinet Office Order impose conduct and safeguarding expectations on Electronic Payment Instrument service providers. These include information-security controls, oversight of entrusted service providers, explanations to users, segregation of users’ Electronic Payment Instruments from the provider’s own assets, periodic audits, and contracts with issuers that address allocation of liability for user losses. The Cabinet Office Order also requires user explanations covering the fact that an Electronic Payment Instrument is not Japanese or foreign currency, potential loss risks, payee-consent limits, issuer information, and redemption-right information.

AML/CFT and travel-rule treatment

The implementing package also interacts with Japan’s anti-money-laundering framework. The FSA’s May 2023 AML/CFT package added Electronic Payment Instrument service providers and certain high-value transferable prepaid-payment-instrument issuers to specified-business-operator treatment, set recordkeeping and transaction-verification details, and addressed travel-rule information for transfers of Electronic Payment Instruments and crypto assets. It also covered measures for unhosted-wallet transactions and checks when providers enter transfer-related alliance agreements.

Status and editorial treatment

For CryptoSlate taxonomy purposes, this profile should be treated as a Japan law-and-regulation profile covering stablecoins, payments, licensing and registration, consumer protection, and AML/CFT. Editors should review any later amendments to the Payment Services Act before using the profile as a complete statement of Japan’s post-2025 payment-services reforms.

Key provisions

Electronic Payment Instrument definition

Defines EPIs as certain currency-denominated electronic value usable and transferable with unspecified persons, plus specified trust interests and equivalents.

Stablecoins Jun 1, 2023 Source

Stablecoin issuer perimeter

FSA materials identify banks, funds transfer service providers and trust companies as issuer categories for digital-money type stablecoins.

Payments Jun 1, 2023 Source

EPI service provider registration

No person may provide Electronic Payment Instrument services unless registered; applications disclose business categories, handled EPIs and issuer details.

Licensing Jun 1, 2023 Source

User protection and segregation

Providers must explain instrument risks and redemption rights, segregate users’ EPIs from their own assets, and undergo periodic audits.

Consumer protection Jun 1, 2023 Source

AML/CFT and travel rule

Implementing rules add EPI service providers to AML/CFT duties and set recordkeeping, travel-rule and unhosted-wallet controls for EPI transfers.

AML/CFT Jun 1, 2023 Source

Timeline

  1. Diet passed amendment act

    FSA states the amendment act was passed on June 3, 2022.

    Passed Source
  2. Promulgated as Act No. 61

    The amendment act was promulgated as Act No. 61 of 2022.

    Enacted Source
  3. Implementing package published

    FSA published draft Cabinet Orders and Cabinet Office Orders for consultation.

    Under consultation Source
  4. Public comments finalized

    FSA published public-comment results and final implementing rules.

    Enacted Source
  5. EPI regime took effect

    Core implementing Cabinet Orders, Cabinet Office Orders, notices, guidance and guidelines took effect or applied.

    In force Source
  6. Attached order effective

    FSA noted that Attachment 11 was promulgated and took effect on Sept. 15, 2023.

    In force Source

Who it affects

Actors

Financial Services Agency of Japan, Local Finance Bureaus, Prime Minister of Japan

Asset classes

Electronic payment instruments, Stablecoins

Official sources

Editorial note

Profile focuses on the 2022 stablecoin/Electronic Payment Instrument amendments and related implementing orders. Review later Payment Services Act amendments before using as a full current-law update.